...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >A comprehensive subaxial cervical spine injury severity assessment model using numeric scores and its predictive value for surgical intervention
【24h】

A comprehensive subaxial cervical spine injury severity assessment model using numeric scores and its predictive value for surgical intervention

机译:基于数字评分的综合性颈下颈椎损伤严重程度评估模型及其对手术干预的预测价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Multiple factors contribute to the determination for surgical intervention in the setting of cervical spinal injury, yet to date no unified classification system exists that predicts this need. The goals of this study were twofold: to create a comprehensive subaxial cervical spine injury severity numeric scoring model, and to determine the predictive value of this model for the probability of surgical intervention. In a retrospective cohort study of 333 patients, neural impairment, patho-morphology, and available spinal canal sagittal diameter post-injury were selected as injury severity determinants. A common numeric scoring trend was created; smaller values indicated less favorable clinical conditions. Neural impairment was graded from 2-10, patho-morphology scoring ranged from 2-15, and post-injury available canal sagittal diameter (SD) was measured in millimeters at the narrowest point of injury. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the numeric scores to predict the probability for surgical intervention. Complete neurologic deficit was found in 39 patients, partial deficits in 108, root injuries in 19, and 167 were neurologically intact. The pre-injury mean canal SD was 14.6 mm; the post-injury measurement mean was 12.3 mm. The mean patho-morphology score for all patients was 10.9 and the mean neurologic function score was 7.6. There was a statistically significant difference in mean scores for neural impairment, canal SD, and patho-morphology for surgical compared to nonsurgical patients. At the lowest clinical score for each determinant, the probability for surgery was 0.949 for neural impairment, 0.989 for post-injury available canal SD, and 0.971 for patho-morphology. The unit odds ratio for each determinant was 1.73, 1.61, and 1.45, for neural impairment, patho-morphology, and canal SD scores, respectively. The subaxial cervical spine injury severity determinants of neural impairment, patho-morphology, and post-injury available canal SD have well defined probability for surgical intervention when scored separately. Our data showed that each determinant alone could act as a primary predictor for surgical intervention.
机译:多种因素有助于确定颈椎损伤情况下的外科手术干预,但迄今为止,尚无统一的分类系统可以预测这一需求。这项研究的目的是双重的:创建一个综合性的亚轴颈椎损伤严重程度数值评分模型,并确定该模型对手术干预可能性的预测价值。在一项针对333例患者的回顾性队列研究中,选择了损伤后神经损伤,病理形态和可用的椎管矢状径作为损伤严重程度的决定因素。创建了通用的数字评分趋势;较小的值表示较差的临床情况。神经损伤的评分为2-10,病理形态评分为2-15,受伤后最窄点的损伤后可用管矢矢直径(SD)以毫米为单位。使用数字评分进行逻辑回归分析以预测手术干预的可能性。在39例患者中发现了完全的神经系统缺陷,在108例中存在部分缺陷,在19例中有根损伤,在167例中存在神经学完整。损伤前平均根管SD为14.6 mm;损伤后测量平均值为12.3mm。所有患者的平均病理形态学评分为10.9,平均神经功能评分为7.6。与非外科手术患者相比,外科手术神经损伤,根管SD和病理形态的平均评分存在统计学差异。在每个决定因素的最低临床评分下,神经功能缺损的手术可能性为0.949,受伤后可用的根管SD的手术可能性为0.989,病理形态的手术可能性为0.971。对于神经损伤,病理形态学和运河SD评分,每个决定因素的单位优势比分别为1.73、1.61和1.45。单独评分时,神经功能缺损,病理形态学和损伤后可利用的根管SD的亚轴颈椎损伤严重程度决定因素具有明确的手术干预可能性。我们的数据表明,每个决定因素都可以作为手术干预的主要预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号