首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >The Impact of Pre-Hospital Administration of Lactated Ringer's Solution versus Normal Saline in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
【24h】

The Impact of Pre-Hospital Administration of Lactated Ringer's Solution versus Normal Saline in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

机译:乳酸林格氏液院前给药与生理盐水相比对颅脑外伤患者的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Lactated Ringer's (LR) and normal saline (NS) are both used for resuscitation of injured patients. NS has been associated with increased resuscitation volume, blood loss, acidosis, and coagulopathy compared with LR. We sought to determine if pre-hospital LR is associated with improved outcome compared with NS in patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). We included patients receiving pre-hospital LR or NS from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study. Patients with TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] head 3) and without TBI (AIS head 2) were compared. Cox proportional hazards models including Injury Severity Score (ISS), AIS head, AIS extremity, age, fluids, intubation status, and hospital site were generated for prediction of mortality. Linear regression models were generated for prediction of red blood cell (RBC) and crystalloid requirement, and admission biochemical/physiological parameters. Seven hundred ninety-one patients received either LR (n=117) or NS (n=674). Median ISS, AIS head, AIS extremity, and pre-hospital fluid volume were higher in TBI and non-TBI patients receiving LR compared with NS (p<0.01). In patients with TBI (n=308), LR was associated with higher adjusted mortality compared with NS (hazard rate [HR]=1.78, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.04, p=0.035). In patients without TBI (n=483), no difference in mortality was demonstrated (HR=1.49, CI 0.757-2.95, p=0.247). Fluid type had no effect on admission biochemical or physiological parameters, 6-hour RBC, or crystalloid requirement in either group. LR was associated with increased mortality compared with NS in patients with TBI. These results underscore the need for a prospective randomized trial comparing pre-hospital LR with NS in patients with TBI.
机译:乳酸林格氏液(LR)和生理盐水(NS)均用于受伤患者的复苏。与LR相比,NS与复苏量增加,失血,酸中毒和凝血病有关。我们试图确定在有或没有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的患者中,院前LR与NS相比是否改善了结局。我们纳入了来自PRospective观察性多中心重大创伤输血(PROMMTT)研究的住院前LR或NS患者。比较了有TBI(缩写为AIS头3)和没有TBI(有AIS头2)的患者。生成包括伤害严重度评分(ISS),AIS头,AIS肢体,年龄,体液,插管状态和医院地点的Cox比例风险模型,以预测死亡率。生成线性回归模型以预测红细胞(RBC)和晶体需求,以及入院生化/生理参数。 791名患者接受了LR(n = 117)或NS(n = 674)。与NS相比,接受LR的TBI和非TBI患者的ISS中位数,AIS头,AIS肢体和院前液体量更高(p <0.01)。在TBI患者中(n = 308),与NS相比,LR与更高的调整死亡率相关(危险率[HR] = 1.78,置信区间[CI] 1.04-3.04,p = 0.035)。在没有TBI的患者中(n = 483),死亡率没有差异(HR = 1.49,CI 0.757-2.95,p = 0.247)。流体类型对入组生化或生理参数,6小时红细胞或晶体需求均无影响。与NS相比,在TBI患者中,LR与死亡率增加相关。这些结果强调需要进行前瞻性随机试验,比较TBI患者的院前LR与NS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号