...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation

机译:不同体切除术和椎间盘摘除术组合后有无辅助后路融合术的颈椎前路颈椎技术的生物力学比较:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Object. The objective of this study was to compare the stiffness and range of motion (ROM) of 4 cervical spine constructs and the intact condition. The 4 constructs consisted of 3-level anterior cervical discectomy with anterior plating, 1-level discectomy and 1-level corpectomy with anterior plating, 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating, and 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating and posterior fixation. Methods. Eight human cadaveric fresh-frozen cervical spines from C2-T2 were used. Three-dimensional motion analysis with an optical tracking device was used to determine motion following various reconstruction methods. The specimens were tested in the following conditions: 1) intact; 2) segmental construct with discectomies at C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7, with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cage and anterior plate; 3) segmental construct with discectomy at C6-7 and corpectomy of C-5, with PEEK interbody graft at the discectomy level and a titanium cage at the corpectomy level; 4) corpectomy at C-5 and C-6, with titanium cage and an anterior cervical plate; and 5) corpectomy at C-5 and C-6, with titanium cage and an anterior cervical plate, and posterior lateral mass screw-rod system from C-4 to C-7. All specimens underwent a pure moment application of 2 Nm with regards to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results. In all tested motions the statistical comparison was significant between the intact condition and the 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating and posterior fixation construct. All other statistical comparisons between the instrumented constructs were not statistically significant except between the 3-level discectomy with anterior plating and the 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating in axial rotation. There were no statistically significant differences between the 1-level discectomy and 1-level corpectomy with anterior plating and the 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating in any tested motion. There was also no statistical significance between the 3-level discectomy with anterior plating and the 2-level corpectomy with anterior plating and posterior fixation. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that segmental plate fixation (3-level discectomy) affords the same stiffness and ROM as circumferential fusion in 2-level cervical spine corpectomy in the immediate postoperative setting. This obviates the need for staged circumferential procedures for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Given that the posterior segmental instrumentation confers significant stability to a multilevel cervical corpectomy, the surgeon should strongly consider the placement of segmental posterior instrumentation to significantly improve the overall stability of the fusion construct after a 2-level cervical corpectomy.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是比较4种颈椎构造的刚度和运动范围(ROM)和完整状况。这4种构造包括3层前路颈椎前路椎间盘摘除术,1层椎间盘切除术和1层前路椎体摘除术,2层前路椎体摘除术和2层前路钢板加后路固定术。方法。使用了八个来自C2-T2的人尸体新鲜冷冻宫颈棘。使用具有光学跟踪设备的三维运动分析来确定遵循各种重构方法的运动。在以下条件下测试样品:1)完整; 2)在C4-5,C5-6和C6-7处有切分的分段构造,带有聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器和前板; 3)分段构造,在C6-7椎间盘切除术和C-5椎体切除术,在椎间盘切除术水平使用PEEK椎体间植入物,在椎体切除术水平使用钛笼。 4)在C-5和C-6进行大体切除术,钛笼和颈前板。 5)在C-5和C-6处进行大体切除术,钛笼和颈前板,以及从C-4到C-7的后侧块状螺钉系统。所有样品在屈伸,横向弯曲和轴向旋转方面均施加2 Nm的纯弯矩。结果。在所有测试的动作中,在完整情况和采用前板固定和后固定结构的2级全切除术之间的统计学比较是显着的。除了轴向旋转的三层椎间盘摘除术和前钢板的前两层椎体切除术之间,在仪器构建体之间的所有其他统计比较在统计学上均无统计学意义。在任何测试的运动中,前板的1级椎间盘切除术和1级的椎体切除术与前板的2级椎体切除术之间无统计学差异。三层椎间盘摘除术联合前路钢板固定和两层椎体切除术联合前路钢板和后路固定术之间也无统计学意义。结论。这项研究表明,在术后即刻进行节段性钢板固定(3级椎间盘切除术)所提供的刚度和ROM与2级颈椎椎体切除术中的环向融合术相同。这消除了对多级颈椎病脊髓病分阶段进行外周手术的需要。鉴于后路节段器械为多层颈椎切除术赋予了显着的稳定性,因此外科医生应强烈考虑节段后路器械的放置,以显着改善2层颈椎切除术后融合结构的整体稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号