首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri-implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis
【24h】

Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri-implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis

机译:牙周袋残留是治疗牙周炎患者种植体周围炎的危险指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of implant treatment in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients (PHP), with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. Methods: Thirty treated periodontally compromised patients (PCP) and 30 PHP, with a total of 117 Straumann implants (PCP = 56, PHP = 61) were matched for age, gender, smoking and implant characteristics. The PCP group was further stratified with patients having at least one periodontal pocket ≥6 mm at follow-up examination allocated to a "residual periodontitis" (RP) group, while the remaining patients were assigned to a "no residual periodontitis" (NRP) group. These groups were compared with respect to probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and marginal bone loss. Results: The mean follow-up period in the PCP and PHP groups was 7.99 years (range 5.04-14.40) and 8.20 years (range 5.00-13.46) respectively. There was no difference in mean PPD between the PCP and PHP groups, but the prevalence of implants with PPD ≥5 mm + BOP was greater in the PCP group than in the PHP group, at both implant- (27% vs. 13%) and patient- (37% vs. 17%) level analyses. Mean implant PPD was significantly greater in the RP group (3.18 mm) than in both the NRP (2.67 mm) and PHP (2.81 mm) groups. Mean bone loss was also significantly greater in the RP group (0.68 mm) than in the NRP (0.23 mm) and PHP groups (0.26 mm). The prevalence of bone loss and PPD ≥5 mm + BOP at the implant level was significantly greater for the RP group compared with both the NRP and PHP groups. Conclusions: Implants in PCP with residual pocketing at follow-up had increased PPD and bone loss compared with implants placed in PHP and PCP without residual pocketing. Hence, it is the maintenance of periodontal health rather than a previous history of periodontitis that is the critical determinant of increased risk of peri-implantitis, highlighting the importance of effective periodontal therapy and maintenance in patients with a history of periodontitis.
机译:目的:这项回顾性研究的目的是比较牙周受损和牙周健康患者(PHP)的植入治疗的临床结果,至少随访5年。方法:根据年龄,性别,吸烟和种植体特征,对30例经治疗的牙周受损患者(PCP)和30例PHP,共117例Straumann植入物(PCP = 56,PHP = 61)进行匹配。在随访检查中,PCP组进一步分为至少一个牙周袋≥6 mm的患者,被分配为“残余牙周炎”(RP)组,而其余患者被分配为“无残余牙周炎”(NRP)组。比较了这些组的探查袋深度(PPD),探查出血(BOP)和边缘骨丢失的情况。结果:PCP和PHP组的平均随访期分别为7.99年(范围5.04-14.40)和8.20年(范围5.00-13.46)。 PCP组和PHP组之间的平均PPD没有差异,但是在两种植入物中,PCP组中PPD≥5 mm + BOP的植入物的患病率均高于PHP组-(27%vs. 13%)和患者-(37%vs. 17%)水平分析。 RP组(3.18 mm)的平均植入物PPD显着高于NRP(2.67 mm)和PHP(2.81 mm)组。 RP组(0.68 mm)的平均骨丢失也显着大于NRP(0.23 mm)和PHP组(0.26 mm)。与NRP和PHP组相比,RP组的骨丢失和PPD≥5 mm + BOP的患病率明显更高。结论:与未残留袋囊的PHP和PCP植入物相比,随访时残留袋囊的PCP植入物增加了PPD和骨丢失。因此,维持牙周健康而不是先前的牙周炎历史是决定种植体周围炎风险增加的关键因素,从而突出了对牙周炎病史患者进行有效牙周治疗和维持的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号