首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >Current opinion on adjuvant and salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Current opinion on adjuvant and salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy.

机译:前列腺癌根治术后辅助治疗和挽救治疗的最新观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: The role of postoperative radiotherapy and hormone treatment after radical prostatectomy is uncertain, with no good evidence base to guide practice. In particular, it is not known whether a blanket policy of adjuvant therapy offers any advantage over a selective approach using salvage treatment in people who develop biochemical failure. Furthermore the technique for postoperative radiotherapy to the prostate bed has not been well described. We surveyed the opinion of UK clinical oncologists to describe current practice, with a view to informing the design of clinical trials in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to elicit the opinion and clinical practice of UK clinical oncologists on the use of radiotherapy and hormone therapy after radical prostatectomy. The questionnaire was distributed to the delegates at the British Institute of Radiology Conference 'Contemporary issues in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy' on 9 May 2003. RESULTS: Forty-nine out of 70 (70%) clinical oncologists completed the questionnaire. With an undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 0.04 ng/ml, opinion was divided on the role of adjuvant therapy. For example, adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended by 51% (25/49) of respondents for cases with pT3 margin positive disease. When recommending adjuvant radiotherapy, 60% (59/99) recommended hormone therapy in addition. In cases with an asymptomatic rising PSA after radical prostatectomy who had not received adjuvant therapy, 93% (43/46) recommended salvage radiotherapy, but the PSA threshold for recommending such treatment varied widely. The two most common dose-fractionation regimens for salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed were 62-64 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions (47%), and 50-55 Gy in 20 fractions (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Opinion is varied within the UK on the role of radiotherapy and hormone therapy after radical prostatectomy. The results of this survey should inform the design of future clinical trials.
机译:目的:根治性前列腺切除术后的术后放疗和激素治疗的作用尚不确定,没有良好的证据来指导实践。尤其是,对于发生生化衰竭的患者,全面的辅助治疗政策是否比采用抢救治疗的选择性方法更具优势,这一点尚不清楚。此外,对前列腺床术后放射疗法的技术还没有很好地描述。我们调查了英国临床肿瘤学家的意见,以描述当前的做法,以期为这种情况下的临床试验设计提供信息。材料与方法:设计了一份问卷,以征询英国临床肿瘤学家对前列腺癌根治术后使用放射疗法和激素疗法的意见和临床实践。问卷于2003年5月9日分发给了英国放射学会会议“前列腺癌放射治疗中的当代问题”的代表。结果:70位临床肿瘤学家中有49位(70%)完成了问卷。术后无法检测到的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)小于0.04 ng / ml,对于辅助治疗的作用存在分歧。例如,对于患有pT3边缘阳性疾病的病例,有51%(25/49)的受访者建议进行辅助放疗。当推荐辅助放疗时,另外有60%(59/99)推荐激素治疗。在未接受辅助治疗的无症状前列腺癌根治术后无症状PSA升高的患者中,有93%(43/46)建议采用挽救性放疗,但推荐此类治疗的PSA阈值差异很大。两种最常见的对前列腺床进行放疗的剂量分割方案是:每日2 Gy剂量(47%)中62-64 Gy,以及20剂量(30%)中50-55 Gy。结论:对于根治性前列腺切除术后英国放射治疗和激素治疗的作用,英国内部意见不一。这项调查的结果应为将来的临床试验设计提供依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号