首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Comparison and Prognostic Analysis of Adjuvant Radiotherapy versus Salvage Radiotherapy for Treatment of Radically Resected Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
【2h】

Comparison and Prognostic Analysis of Adjuvant Radiotherapy versus Salvage Radiotherapy for Treatment of Radically Resected Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

机译:放射治疗局部切除的晚期食管鳞癌的辅助放疗与挽救性放疗的比较和预后分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To compare adjuvant radiotherapy and salvage radiotherapy after radical resection for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods. Data from 155 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent radical resection and received postoperative radiotherapy from 2005 to 2011 were reviewed. Seventy-nine patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and 76 received salvage radiotherapy after locoregional recurrence. Results. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the adjuvant radiotherapy group than the salvage radiotherapy group (DFS 25.73 months versus 10.73 months, P < 0.001; OS 33.33 months versus 26.22 months, P = 0.006). The independent prognostic factors for DFS were performance status (PS) before radiotherapy and pathological stage in the adjuvant radiotherapy group, compared with lymph node metastasis, tumor location, and adjuvant chemotherapy in the salvage radiotherapy group. The independent prognostic factors for OS were age and PS in both groups. No differences in median DFS and OS between the groups were observed in patients aged > 65 years or with PS ≥ 2. Conclusion. Compared to salvage radiotherapy, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy can prolong DFS and OS for patients with radically resected local advanced ESCC but cannot improve survival for patients aged > 65 years or with PS ≥ 2.
机译:目的。为了比较根治性切除后食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的辅助放疗和抢救性放疗。方法。回顾性分析了2005年至2011年间接受根治性切除并接受术后放疗的155例局部晚期ESCC患者的数据。局部复发后有79例接受了辅助放疗,有76例接受了挽救性放疗。结果。辅助放疗组的中位无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)明显高于挽救放疗组(DFS 25.73个月对10.73个月,P <0.001; OS 33.33个月对26.22个月,P = 0.006 )。 DFS的独立预后因素为辅助放疗组放疗前的状态(PS)和病理分期,而挽救放疗组则为淋巴结转移,肿瘤位置和辅助化疗。两组中OS的独立预后因素是年龄和PS。在65岁以上或PS≥2的患者中,两组之间的中值DFS和OS没有差异。与抢救性放疗相比,术后辅助放疗可对局部切除的局部晚期ESCC患者延长DFS和OS,但不能改善65岁以上或PS≥2的患者的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号