...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Molecular Evolution >Rod and cone opsin families differ in spectral tuning domains but not signal transducing domains as judged by saturated evolutionary trace analysis
【24h】

Rod and cone opsin families differ in spectral tuning domains but not signal transducing domains as judged by saturated evolutionary trace analysis

机译:杆和视锥蛋白家族在频谱调谐域上有所不同,但通过饱和进化轨迹分析判断,信号转导域没有差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The visual receptor of rods and cones is a covalent complex of the apoprotein, opsin, and the light-sensitive chromophore, 11-cis-retinal. This pigment must fulfill many functions including photoactivation, spectral tuning, signal transmission, inactivation, and chromophore regeneration. Rod and cone photoreceptors employ distinct families of opsins. Although it is well known that these opsin families provide unique ranges in spectral sensitivity, it is unclear whether the families have additional functional differences. In this study, we use evolutionary trace (ET) analysis of 188 vertebrate opsin sequences to identify functionally important sites in each opsin family. We demonstrate the following results. (1) The available vertebrate opsin sequences produce a definitive description of all five vertebrate opsin families. This is the first demonstration of sequence saturation prior to ET analysis, which we term saturated ET (SET). (2) The cone opsin classes have class-specific sites compared to the rod opsin class. These sites reside in the transmembrane region and tune the spectral sensitivity of each opsin class to its characteristic wavelength range. (3) The cytoplasmic loops, primarily responsible for signal transmission and inactivation, are essentially invariant in rod versus cone opsins. This indicates that the electrophysiological differences between rod and cone photoreceptors cannot be ascribed to differences in the protein interaction regions of the opsins. SET shows that chromophore binding and regeneration are the only aspects of opsin structure likely to have functionally significant differences between rods and cones, whereas excitatory and adaptational properties of the opsin families appear to be functionally invariant.
机译:视杆和视锥的视觉受体是载脂蛋白视蛋白和光敏发色团11-顺-视网膜的共价复合物。这种颜料必须具有许多功能,包括光活化,光谱调节,信号传输,失活和生色团再生。视杆和视锥光感受器采用不同的视蛋白家族。尽管众所周知,这些视蛋白家族在光谱敏感性方面提供了独特的范围,但尚不清楚这些家族是否具有其他功能差异。在这项研究中,我们使用188个脊椎动物视蛋白序列的进化轨迹(ET)分析来识别每个视蛋白家族中功能上重要的位点。我们证明以下结果。 (1)现有的脊椎动物视蛋白序列对所有五个脊椎动物视蛋白家族产生了明确的描述。这是ET分析之前序列饱和的第一个演示,我们称其为饱和ET(SET)。 (2)相比视杆视蛋白类,视锥蛋白类具有特定于类的部位。这些位点位于跨膜区域,并将每个视蛋白类别的光谱灵敏度调节到其特征波长范围。 (3)主要负责信号传递和失活的胞质环在视杆视锥细胞和视锥视视蛋白中基本上是不变的。这表明杆和锥感光体之间的电生理差异不能归因于视蛋白的蛋白质相互作用区域中的差异。 SET显示,发色团的结合和再生是视蛋白结构的唯一方面,可能在视杆和视锥细胞之间具有功能上的显着差异,而视蛋白家族的兴奋性和适应性特性似乎在功能上是不变的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号