首页> 外文期刊>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation >Low-level laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of subacromial -impingement syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Low-level laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of subacromial -impingement syndrome: A randomized clinical trial

机译:低水平激光疗法与超声疗法治疗肩峰下冲击综合征:一项随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty one patients with subacromial impingement syndrome were randomly assigned to low-level laser therapy group (n = 16) and ultrasound therapy group (n = 15). Study participants received 10 treatment sessions of low-level laser therapy or ultrasound therapy over a period of two-consecutive weeks (five days per week). Outcome measures (visual analogue pain scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index -SPADI-, patient's satisfactory level and sleep interference score) were assessed before treatment and at the 1st and 3rd months after treatment. All patients were analyzed by the intent-to-treat principle.RESULTS: Mean reduction in VAS pain, SPADI disability and sleep interference scores from baseline to after 1 month, and 3 months of treatment was statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean change in VAS pain, SPADI disability and sleep interference scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean level of patient satisfaction in group 1 at the first and third months after treatment was 72.45 ± 23.45 mm and 71.50 ± 16.54 mm, respectively. The mean level of patient satisfaction in group 2 at the first and third months after treatment was 70.38 ± 21.52 mm and 72.09 ± 13.42 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean level of patient satisfaction between the two groups (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that efficacy of both treatments were comparable to each other in regarding reducing pain severity and functional disability in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Based on our findings, we conclude that low-level laser therapy may be considered as an effective alternative to ultrasound based therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome especially ultrasound based therapy is contraindicated.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较低水平激光治疗和超声治疗在亚肩峰撞击综合征中的疗效。材料与方法:31例亚肩峰撞击综合征患者被随机分为低水平激光治疗组。 (n = 16)和超声治疗组(n = 15)。研究参与者在连续两周(每周五天)的时间内接受了10次低水平激光治疗或超声治疗。在治疗前和治疗后第1、3个月评估结果指标(视觉模拟疼痛量表,肩膀疼痛和残疾指数-SPADI-,患者的满意水平和睡眠干扰评分)。结果:从基线到1个月后,VAS疼痛,SPADI残疾和睡眠干扰评分的平均降低从两组到治疗3个月均具有统计学意义(P <0.05) 。但是,两组之间的VAS疼痛,SPADI残疾和睡眠干扰评分的平均变化没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。治疗后第一个月和第三个月,第一组患者的平均满意度分别为72.45±23.45 mm和71.50±16.54 mm。在治疗后的第一个月和第三个月,第二组的患者满意度平均水平分别为70.38±21.52 mm和72.09±13.42 mm。两组患者的平均满意度之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:结果表明,在降低肩峰以下撞击患者的疼痛严重程度和功能障碍方面,两种治疗方法的疗效可比。综合症。根据我们的发现,我们得出结论,对于肩峰下撞击综合征的患者,低剂量激光治疗可能被认为是基于超声的治疗的有效替代方法,尤其是基于超声的治疗是禁忌的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号