首页> 外文期刊>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation >Comparing the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack treatments for knee osteoarthritis.
【24h】

Comparing the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack treatments for knee osteoarthritis.

机译:比较成熟的泥敷和热敷治疗膝盖骨关节炎的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of mature mud pack and hot pack therapies on patients with knee osteoarthritis.Design: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized-controlled, and single-blinded clinical trial. Twenty-seven patients with clinical and radiologic evidence of knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned into two groups and were treated with mature mud packs (n 15) or hot packs (n=12). Patients were evaluated for pain [based on the visual analog scale (VAS)], function (WOMAC, 6 min walking distance), quality of life [Short Form-36 (SF-36)], and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6~months after treatment. Results: The mud pack group shows a significant improvement in VAS, pain, stifness, and physical function domains of WOMAC. The difference between groups of pain and physical activity domains is significant at post-treatment in favor of mud pack. For a 6 min walking distance, mud pack shows significant improvement, and the difference is significant between groups in favor of mud pack at post-treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Mud pack shows significant improvement in the pain subscale of SF-36 at the third month continuing until the sixth month after the treatment. Significant improvements are found for the social function, vitality/energy, physical role disability, and general health subscales of SF-36 in favor of the mud pack compared with the hot pack group at post-treatment. A significant increase is detected for IGF-1 in the mud pack group 3 months after treatment compared with the baseline, and the difference is significant between groups 3 months after the treatment. Conclusion: Mud pack is a favorable option compared with hotpack for pain relief and for the improvement of functional conditions in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较成熟的泥敷和热敷疗法对膝部骨关节炎患者的疗效。设计:本研究是一项前瞻性,随机对照和单盲临床研究。将27例有膝关节骨关节炎的临床和影像学证据的患者随机分为两组,并分别用成熟的泥袋(n = 15)或热袋(n = 12)进行治疗。对患者进行疼痛评估[基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)],功能(WOMAC,6分钟步行距离),生活质量[简短表格36(SF-36)]和血清肿瘤坏死因子-基线,治疗后以及治疗后3个月和6个月时,α(TNF-α),白介素6(IL-6)和胰岛素样生长因子1(IGF-1)。结果:泥浆敷料组在WOMAC的VAS,疼痛,僵硬和身体功能域方面显示出显着改善。在治疗后,泥浆组对疼痛和身体活动区域的影响是显着的。对于6分钟的步行距离,泥浆堆显示出明显的改善,并且两组之间的差异是显着的,有利于在治疗后以及治疗后3和6个月使用泥浆堆。在治疗后的第三个月,泥浆袋显示SF-36疼痛分量表的明显改善,持续至第六个月。与热敷组相比,SF-36的社会功能,活力/能量,身体角色残疾和一般健康分量表均得到了显着改善,而热敷组在治疗后更为明显。与基线相比,治疗后3个月泥浆组中的IGF-1显着增加,并且治疗3个月后各组之间的差异显着。结论:与热敷袋相比,泥敷袋是缓解膝关节疼痛和改善功能状况的理想选择,可治疗膝部骨关节炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号