...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Virology >Development and implementation of real-time nucleic acid amplification for the detection of enterovirus infections in comparison to rapid culture of various clinical specimens.
【24h】

Development and implementation of real-time nucleic acid amplification for the detection of enterovirus infections in comparison to rapid culture of various clinical specimens.

机译:与各种临床标本的快速培养相比,实时核酸扩增技术的开发和实施可用于检测肠道病毒感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several real-time PCR and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) primer pairs and a modified real-time PCR primer pair for the detection of enteroviruses were compared. The modified real-time PCR primer pair was evaluated on clinical samples in comparison with cell culture using the MagnaPure LC Isolation instrument for nucleic acid extraction. Six hundred forty samples could be examined both by cell culture and real-time PCR. Faecal specimens (n = 285), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 210), throat swabs (n = 113), biopsies (n = 1--, vesicular fluid (n = 11), and pleural fluid specimens (n = 9) were included. By culture, 26/640 (4%) samples were positive for enterovirus. By real-time PCR, the number of positive specimens was 50 (7.8%). Of the 210 cerebrospinal fluid samples, three were positive by culture and nine by real-time PCR. Seventeen and 33 of a total of 285 faecal specimens were positive by culture and real-time PCR, respectively. In case of discrepant results, the clinical symptoms were in accordance with an infection due to enteroviruses. Genotyping using the VP1 gene correlated with serotyping by neutralization. In contrast, six of the 19 specimens that could be typed both by neutralization and by sequencing using the VP4 domain yielded a different genotype, yet within the same species. Real-time PCR turned out to be suitable for the detection of enteroviruses in the daily routine setting. In comparison to rapid culture, it offers a rapid, more sensitive, and reliable assay; especially in cerebrospinal fluid, the yield of enteroviruses is much higher.
机译:比较了几种实时PCR和基于核酸序列的扩增(NASBA)引物对以及用于检测肠病毒的改良实时PCR引物对。与使用MagnaPure LC分离仪进行核酸提取的细胞培养相比,在临床样品上评估了修饰的实时PCR引物对。可以通过细胞培养和实时PCR检测640个样品。粪便标本(n = 285),脑脊液(n = 210),咽喉拭子(n = 113),活检(n = 1--),囊泡液(n = 11)和胸膜液标本(n = 9)是通过培养,肠病毒呈阳性的占26/640(4%);通过实时PCR阳性的样本为50(7.8%);在210例脑脊液中,培养呈阳性,九为阳性通过实时PCR检测,共285份粪便标本中的17份和33份通过实时PCR检测为阳性,在结果不一致的情况下,临床症状与肠病毒感染有关。 VP1基因与中和血清型相关,相反,在19个标本中既可以通过中和又可以通过VP4域测序的样本中,有6个产生了不同的基因型,但属于同一物种,实时PCR证明是合适的在日常设置中用于检测肠病毒。对于快速培养,它提供了快速,更灵敏和可靠的测定方法;特别是在脑脊液中,肠病毒的产量要高得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号