首页> 外文期刊>Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection: Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi >Comparisons of dengue illness classified based on the 1997 and 2009 World Health Organization dengue classification schemes
【24h】

Comparisons of dengue illness classified based on the 1997 and 2009 World Health Organization dengue classification schemes

机译:根据1997年和2009年世界卫生组织登革热分类方案对登革热疾病进行分类的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/Purpose: Dengue cases, traditionally classified as dengue fever (DF) or dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) by the World Health Organization (WHO) dengue classification 1997 scheme, are categorized into Group A (without warning signs), Group B [with warning signs (e.g., abdominal pain/vomiting/fluid accumulation/mucosal bleeding/lethargy/liver enlargement/increasing hematocrit with decreasing platelets)], or Group C (severe plasma leakage/severe bleeding/organ failure) by the WHO 2009 version. We compared differences in clinical/laboratory features between patients separately classified as DF/DHF and in Group A/B/C. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of dengue patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2010. Results: A total of 148 adult patients (119 DF/29 DHF; 64 Group A/77 Group B/7 Group C) were included. Compared with DF, significantly younger age, lower hospitalization rate, and higher platelet count were found in Group A. Compared with DHF, higher platelet count was found in Group B. Six of seven patients (86%) classified as Group C fulfilled the criteria of DHF. A cross tabulation showed DF cases were distributed in all of the severity groups stratified by the WHO dengue 2009 scheme (53.8% Group A/45.4% Group B/0.8% Group C); of the DHF cases, 23 (79%) were categorized as Group B, and six (20.7%) as Group C. All patients in Group A fell into the category DF. Conclusion: The WHO 2009 scheme is effective in identifying severe dengue cases. Heterogeneity in severity suggests careful severity discrimination in patients classified in Group B is needed. Our data suggest that it is safe to treat patients classified as Group A on an outpatient basis.
机译:背景/目的:世界卫生组织(WHO)1997年登革热分类计划将登革热病例传统上分为登革热(DF)或登革出血热(DHF),分为A组(无警告标志),B组[警告标志(例如,腹痛/呕吐/积液/粘膜出血/嗜睡/肝脏肿大/血细胞比容增加,血小板减少)]或WHO 2009版的C组(严重血浆漏出/严重出血/器官衰竭)。我们比较了分别归类为DF / DHF和A / B / C组的患者在临床/实验室特征上的差异。方法:我们对2008年至2010年确诊的登革热患者进行了回顾性分析。结果:共纳入148名成年患者(119 DF / 29 DHF; 64组A / 77 B / 7组C)。与DF相比,A组的年龄明显更年轻,住院率更低,血小板计数更高。与DHF相比,B组的血小板计数更高。被分类为C组的7例患者中有6例(86%)符合标准DHF。交叉表显示,DF病例分布在根据WHO WHO登革热2009计划分层的所有严重程度组中(A组为53.8%,B组为45.4%,C组为0.8%);在DHF病例中,有23例(79%)被归为B组,而6例(20.7%)被归为C组。A组的所有患者均属于DF类。结论:WHO 2009计划可有效识别严重登革热病例。严重程度的异质性表明,需要对B组患者进行认真的严重程度区分。我们的数据表明,在门诊患者中治疗A组患者是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号