首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images.
【24h】

Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images.

机译:对比增强的动态乳房MR图像中肿块病变的鲁棒分割。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a computerized segmentation method for breast MRI (BMRI) mass-lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized segmentation algorithm was developed to segment mass-like-lesions on breast MRI. The segmentation algorithm involved: (i) interactive lesion selection, (ii) automatic intensity threshold estimation, (iii) connected component analysis, and (iv) a postprocessing procedure for hole-filling and leakage removal. Seven observers manually traced the borders of all slices of 30 mass-lesions using the same tools. To initiate the computerized segmentation, each user selected a seed-point for each lesion interactively using two methods: direct seed-point and robust region of interest (ROI) selections. The manual and computerized segmentations were compared pair-wise using the measured size and overlap to evaluate similarity, and the reproducibility of the computerized segmentation was compared with the interobserver variability of the manual delineations. RESULTS: The observed inter- and intraobserver variations were similar (P > 0.05). Computerized segmentation using the robust ROI selection method was significantly (P < 0.001) more reproducible in measuring lesion size (stDev 1.8%) than either manual contouring (11.7%) or computerized segmentation using directly placed seed-point method (13.7%). CONCLUSION: The computerized segmentation method using robust ROI selection is more reproducible than manual delineation in terms of measuring the size of a mass-lesion.
机译:目的:开发和评估乳腺MRI(BMRI)肿块的计算机分割方法。材料与方法:开发了一种计算机分割算法,可对乳腺MRI上的肿块样病变进行分割。分割算法涉及:(i)交互式病变选择,(ii)自动强度阈值估计,(iii)连接的成分分析,以及(iv)孔填充和泄漏消除的后处理程序。七个观察员使用相同的工具手动绘制了30个肿块的所有切片的边界。为了启动计算机分割,每个用户使用两种方法交互地为每个病变选择一个种子点:直接种子点和健壮的感兴趣区域(ROI)选择。使用测量的大小和重叠对手动分割和计算机分割进行成对比较,以评估相似性,并将计算机分割的可重复性与手动分割的观察者间差异进行比较。结果:观察者之间和观察者之间的变化相似(P> 0.05)。使用健壮的ROI选择方法进行计算机分割在测量病变大小(stDev 1.8%)方面比使用手动轮廓(11.7%)或使用直接放置的种子点方法进行计算机分割(13.7%)显着更高(P <0.001)。结论:在测量肿块的大小方面,使用可靠的ROI选择的计算机分割方法比手动勾画具有更高的重现性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号