...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microbiological Methods >An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (P-mic) in forest soils with differing P stocks
【24h】

An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (P-mic) in forest soils with differing P stocks

机译:基于气态和液体熏蒸的实验室间比较,该方法测量了不同磷储量的森林土壤中的微生物磷(P-mic)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In an inter-laboratory trial, gaseous ("CFE") and liquid fumigation ("Resin") based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (P-mic) were compared, based on the analysis of soil samples from five forests, which differ in their P stocks. Both methods reliably detected the same P-mic gradient in the different soils. However, when the individual recovery rates of spiked P were taken into account, the "CFE" based methods consistently generated higher P-mic values (factor 2) compared to the "Resin" based approaches. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在实验室间试验中,基于对五种森林土壤样品的分析,比较了基于气态(CFE)和液体熏蒸(“ Resin”)的测量微生物磷(P-mic)的方法。 P股。两种方法都能在不同土壤中可靠地检测到相同的P-mic梯度。但是,考虑到加标P的单个回收率时,与基于“树脂”的方法相比,基于“ CFE”的方法始终产生更高的P-mic值(因子2)。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号