首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microbiological Methods >Evaluation of five commercial methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from human faecal samples for downstream molecular detection of the enteric protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba spp
【24h】

Evaluation of five commercial methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from human faecal samples for downstream molecular detection of the enteric protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba spp

机译:评价从人类粪便样品中提取和纯化DNA的五种商业方法,用于肠道原生动物寄生虫隐孢子虫,贾第鞭毛虫和肠虫的下游分子检测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

High quality, pure DNA is required for ensuring reliable and reproducible results in molecular diagnosis applications. A number of in-house and commercial methods are available for the extraction and purification of genomic DNA from faecal material, each one offering a specific combination of performance, cost-effectiveness, and easiness of use that should be conveniently evaluated in function of the pathogen of interest. In this comparative study the marketed kits QIAamp DNA stool mini (Qiagen), SpeedTools DNA extraction (Biotools), DNAExtract-VK (Vacunek), PowerFecal DNA isolation (MoBio), and Wizard magnetic DNA purification system (Promega Corporation) were assessed for their efficacy in obtaining DNA of the most relevant enteric protozoan parasites associated to gastrointestinal disease globally. A panel of 113 stool specimens of clinically confirmed patients with cryptosporidiosis (n = 29), giardiasis (n = 47) and amoebiasis by Entamoeba histolytica (n = 3) or E. dispar (n = 10) and apparently healthy subjects (n = 24) were used for this purpose. Stool samples were aliquoted in five sub-samples and individually processed by each extraction method evaluated. Purified DNA samples were subsequently tested in PCR-based assays routinely used in our laboratory. The five compared methods yielded amplifiable amounts of DNA of the pathogens tested, although performance differences were observed among them depending on the parasite and the infection burden. Methods combining chemical, enzymatic and/or mechanical lysis procedures at temperatures of at least 56 degrees C were proven more efficient for the release of DNA from Cryptosporidium oocysts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:需要高质量的纯DNA,以确保在分子诊断应用中获得可靠和可重复的结果。有许多内部和商业方法可用于从粪便中提取和纯化基因组DNA,每种方法都具有性能,成本效益和易用性的特定组合,应根据病原体的功能对其进行方便的评估出于兴趣。在这项比较研究中,对市场上销售的试剂盒QIAamp DNA mini mini(Qiagen),SpeedTools DNA提取(Biotools),DNAExtract-VK(Vacunek),PowerFecal DNA分离(MoBio)和Wizard磁性DNA纯化系统(Promega Corporation)进行了评估。全球获得与肠胃疾病相关的最相关的肠道原生动物寄生虫的DNA的功效。由临床确诊的隐孢子虫病(n = 29),贾第鞭毛虫病(n = 47)和阿米巴肠溶杆菌(n = 3)或变形杆菌(n.dispar)(n = 10)和明显健康的受试者(n = 24)用于此目的。将凳子样品分成五个子样品,并分别通过评估的每种提取方法进行处理。纯化的DNA样品随后在我们实验室中常规使用的基于PCR的分析中进行测试。尽管根据寄生虫和感染负担而观察到性能差异,但五种比较方法产生了可扩增量的被测病原体DNA。在至少56摄氏度的温度下,结合化学,酶和/或机械裂解程序的方法被证明对于从隐孢子虫卵囊中释放DNA更为有效。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号