...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical systems >Two Automated Techniques for Carotid Lumen Diameter Measurement: Regional versus Boundary Approaches
【24h】

Two Automated Techniques for Carotid Lumen Diameter Measurement: Regional versus Boundary Approaches

机译:颈动脉腔直径测量的两种自动化技术:区域方法与边界方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The degree of stenosis in the carotid artery can be predicted using automated carotid lumen diameter (LD) measured from B-mode ultrasound images. Systolic velocity-based methods for measurement of LD are subjective. With the advancement of high resolution imaging, image-based methods have started to emerge. However, they require robust image analysis for accurate LD measurement. This paper presents two different algorithms for automated segmentation of the lumen borders in carotid ultrasound images. Both algorithms are modeled as a two stage process. Stage one consists of a global-based model using scale-space framework for the extraction of the region of interest. This stage is common to both algorithms. Stage two is modeled using a local-based strategy that extracts the lumen interfaces. At this stage, the algorithm-1 is modeled as a region-based strategy using a classification framework, whereas the algorithm-2 is modeled as a boundary-based approach that uses the level set framework. Two sets of databases (DB), Japan DB (JDB) (202 patients, 404 images) and Hong Kong DB (HKDB) (50 patients, 300 images) were used in this study. Two trained neuroradiologists performed manual LD tracings. The mean automated LD measured was 6.35 +/- 0.95 mm for JDB and 6.20 +/- 1.35 mm for HKDB. The precision-of-merit was: 97.4 % and 98.0 % w.r.t to two manual tracings for JDB and 99.7 % and 97.9 % w.r.t to two manual tracings for HKDB. Statistical tests such as ANOVA, Chi-Squared, T-test, and Mann-Whitney test were conducted to show the stability and reliability of the automated techniques.
机译:可以使用从B型超声图像测量的自动颈动脉腔直径(LD)来预测颈动脉狭窄程度。基于收缩速度的LD测量方法是主观的。随着高分辨率成像的发展,基于图像的方法开始出现。但是,它们需要强大的图像分析才能进行准确的LD测量。本文提出了两种自动分割颈动脉超声图像内腔边界的算法。两种算法都被建模为两个阶段的过程。第一阶段包括使用比例空间框架提取感兴趣区域的基于全局的模型。这两个算法都相同。第二阶段使用提取流明界面的基于局部的策略进行建模。在此阶段,使用分类框架将算法1建模为基于区域的策略,而将算法2建模为使用级别集框架的基于边界的方法。本研究使用了两组数据库(DB),即日本DB(JDB)(202例患者,404张图像)和香港DB(HKDB)(50例患者,300张图像)。两名受过训练的神经放射科医生进行了手动LD追踪。 JDB测得的平均自动LD为6.35 +/- 0.95 mm,HKDB测得的平均自动LD为6.20 +/- 1.35 mm。优点精度:对于JDB的两次手动跟踪,分别为97.4%和98.0%w.r.t,对于HKDB的两次手动跟踪,分别为99.7%和97.9%w.r.t.。进行了统计检验,例如方差分析,卡方检验,T检验和曼惠特尼检验,以显示自动化技术的稳定性和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号