...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia.
【24h】

The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia.

机译:杀死和放任的道德:主动和被动安乐死。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In their account of passive euthanasia, Garrard and Wilkinson present arguments that might lead one to overlook significant moral differences between killing and letting die. To kill is not the same as to let die. Similarly, there are significant differences between active and passive euthanasia. Our moral duties differ with regard to them. We are, in general, obliged to refrain from killing each and everyone. We do not have a similar obligation to try (or to continue to try) to prevent each and everyone from dying. In any case, to be morally obliged to persist in trying to prevent their deaths would be different from being morally obliged to refrain from killing all other people even if we had both obligations.
机译:考虑到被动安乐死,加拉德和威尔金森提出的论点可能会导致人们忽视杀戮和死亡之间的重大道德差异。杀死与死亡不一样。同样,主动安乐死与被动安乐死也存在显着差异。我们在道德义务上有所不同。总的来说,我们有义务避免杀死每个人。我们没有类似的义务尝试(或继续尝试)以防止每个人死亡。无论如何,在道德上有义务继续努力防止他们的死亡与在道德上有义务避免杀死所有其他人是不同的,即使我们同时承担两项义务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号