首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Physician obligation to provide care during disasters: Should physicians have been required to go to fukushima?
【24h】

Physician obligation to provide care during disasters: Should physicians have been required to go to fukushima?

机译:医师在灾难期间提供护理的义务:是否应要求医师前往福岛?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On 11 March 2011, Japan experienced a major disaster brought about by a 9.0-magnitude earthquake and a massive tsunami that followed. This disaster caused extensive damage to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant with the release of a large amount of radiation, leading to a crisis level 7 on the International Atomic Energy Agency scale. In this report, we discuss the obligations of physicians to provide care during the initial weeks after the disaster. We appeal to the obligation of general beneficence and argue that physicians should go to disaster zones only if there is no significant risk, cost or burden associated with doing so. We conclude that physicians were not obligated to go to Fukushima given the high risk of radiation exposure and physical and psychological harm. However, we must acknowledge that there were serious epistemic difficulties in accurately assessing the risks or benefits of travelling to Fukushima at the time. The discussion that follows is highly pertinent to all countries that rely on nuclear energy.
机译:2011年3月11日,日本经历了9.0级地震和随后的大规模海啸造成的重大灾难。由于释放了大量的辐射,这场灾难对福岛第一核电站造成了广泛的破坏,导致国际原子能机构规模达到了7级危机。在本报告中,我们讨论了灾难发生后最初几周内医生提供护理的义务。我们呼吁全面受益,并主张只有在没有重大风险,成本或负担的情况下,医生才应前往灾区。我们得出的结论是,鉴于辐射暴露和身心伤害的高风险,医生没有义务去福岛。但是,我们必须承认,在准确评估当时前往福岛的风险或收益方面存在严重的认识困难。接下来的讨论与所有依赖核能的国家都息息相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号