首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Macroeconomics >The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock?
【24h】

The price puzzle revisited: Can the cost channel explain a rise in inflation after a monetary policy shock?

机译:重新审视价格难题:成本渠道能否解释货币政策冲击后通胀上升?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores whether the cost channel solves the price puzzle. We set-up a New Keynesian DSGE model and estimate it for the euro area by adopting a minimum distance approach. Our findings suggest that - under certain parameter restrictions which are not rejected by the data - the cost channel helps to generate an initial rise of inflation after a monetary contraction.Vector autoregressive (VAR) models have become a popular tool for analyzing the effects of monetary policy on the aggregate economy. Despite the popularity, VAR models have been criticized as they occasionally display a controversial result, namely a rise in inflation - that prevails at least temporarily - after a monetary contraction. Sims (1992) originally commented on this phenomenon, which has been labeled the price puzzle (Eichenbaum, 1992). In a VAR model, the presence of a price puzzle casts serious doubts on the possibility of properly identifying a monetary policy shock. Sims (1992) points out that central banks focus on a variety of variables useful for forecasting future inflation that are possibly neglected in the econometric specification,which implies that the unexpected part of a monetary policy shock is insufficiently measured. Consequently, the price puzzle should be mitigated once indicators of nascent inflation - such as commodity prices - are additionally accounted for (Sims, 1992; Leeper et al, 1996; Christiano et al., 1999).
机译:本文探讨了成本渠道是否可以解决价格难题。我们建立了一个新的凯恩斯主义DSGE模型,并通过采用最小距离方法对欧元区进行了估算。我们的发现表明-在某些未被数据拒绝的参数限制下-成本通道有助于在货币紧缩后产生初始通胀上升。矢量自回归(VAR)模型已成为分析货币影响的流行工具总体经济政策。尽管VAR模型很受欢迎,但仍受到批评,因为它们偶尔会显示有争议的结果,即在货币紧缩之后通货膨胀上升(至少暂时是通货膨胀)。 Sims(1992)最初对这种现象进行了评论,这种现象被称为价格难题(Eichenbaum,1992)。在VAR模型中,价格难题的存在使人们对正确识别货币政策冲击的可能性产生严重怀疑。 Sims(1992)指出,中央银行侧重于各种可能用于预测未来通货膨胀的变量,这些变量可能在计量经济学规范中被忽略,这意味着货币政策冲击的意外部分没有得到足够的衡量。因此,一旦额外考虑了新生通货膨胀的指标(例如商品价格),就应减轻价格难题(Sims,1992; Leeper等,1996; Christiano等,1999)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号