首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Information Warfare >Fusion: A Behavioural Approach to Counterinsurgency
【24h】

Fusion: A Behavioural Approach to Counterinsurgency

机译:融合:一种平叛行为的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article examines the way in which military operations abroad are organised to combine efforts. It will seek to illustrate where the current organisations involved would tend to work separately, thus enhancing the chance for missed opportunities, wrong assessment of situations or counter-productive action. To achieve flexibility there has been a great deal of emphasis on the network perspective to organisation, causing concepts such as network enabled capability and network centric warfare to become common good. Based on previous experience in the field, it is proposed here that an additional element will better allow the various disciplines to work together in a concerted manner providing a good base for human understanding of the situation and effects caused by previous decisions. The main focus of this approach is to influence attitudes and induce a desired behavioural context in the area of operations (AO). These ideas sprouted in Afghanistan during the installation of a fusion cell in 2006 which combined people from various disciplines to assess incoming information; impact of recent events; and impact of our own decisions and actions. Current operations and security environment are increasingly complex and require an organisational structure that is flexible and synergies, creating the necessary pre-conditions for a well conceived 3Block warfare approach. The operational environment has to be viewed in a behavioural context. The last decades we have seen situations in which military involvement was not Limited to achieving military victory. Rather, it was one of the instruments to influence behaviour. Using this behavioural approach, fusion cell members assess all actors as complex, adaptive, interactive systems-of-systems in a wider context. These actors not only include the local population, leaders and media but also the public and policymakers of troop contributing and other countries of influence. To put these actors in their proper context political, military, cultural, and economical aspects of the environment are taken into account. In this article the added value of the fusion approach in Afghanistan is highlighted and recommendations for structurally implementing this approach in future COIN operations are made.
机译:本文研究了在国外组织军事行动以联合努力的方式。它将试图说明当前所涉组织在哪里倾向于单独工作,从而增加错失机会,对情况的错误评估或适得其反的行动的机会。为了实现灵活性,已经高度重视组织的网络角度,这使得诸如网络使能能力和以网络为中心的作战之类的概念成为共同的利益。根据以前在该领域的经验,在此建议增加一个要素,以更好地使各个学科以一致的方式共同努力,为人类理解先前决定所造成的情况和后果提供良好的基础。这种方法的主要重点是影响态度,并在行动领域(AO)产生所需的行为环境。这些想法在2006年建立融合小组期间在阿富汗萌芽,该小组融合了来自各个学科的人员来评估传入的信息;最近事件的影响;和我们自己的决定和行动的影响。当前的运营和安全环境日益复杂,需要灵活且协同的组织结构,这为构想周密的3Block战争方法创造了必要的先决条件。必须在行为上下文中查看操作环境。在过去的几十年中,我们看到了军事参与并不局限于取得军事胜利的情况。相反,它是影响行为的手段之一。使用这种行为方法,融合单元成员在更广泛的范围内将所有参与者评估为复杂的,自适应的,交互的系统系统。这些行为者不仅包括当地居民,领导人和媒体,还包括部队派遣国和其他有影响力国家的公众和决策者。为了使这些行为者处于适当的环境中,必须考虑到环境的政治,军事,文化和经济方面。本文着重强调了融合方法在阿富汗的附加价值,并提出了在未来的COIN行动中以结构方式实施此方法的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号