首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health >Comparisons of Colorado women's cancer screening practices by residence: metropolitan, non-metropolitan, and farm.
【24h】

Comparisons of Colorado women's cancer screening practices by residence: metropolitan, non-metropolitan, and farm.

机译:科罗拉多州女性癌症筛查实践的比较,按住所划分:大都市,非大都市和农场。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Combining farm residents and non-farm rural residents into a single category designated as rural may obscure differences in preventive care utilization, including cancer screening practices in each group, because of distinctive characteristics of farmers. This study compared three cancer screening practices (mammography, breast physical examination, and Pap smears) across three residence groups (metropolitan, non-metropolitan, and farms) of Colorado women and described demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the groups. Females interviewed in the 1993 Colorado Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were divided into residence as metropolitan or non-metropolitan. Farm residents were female respondents interviewed as part of the Colorado Farm Family Health and Hazard Survey (CFFHHS) conducted in 1993-1997. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine characteristics related to the screening practices. Farm women were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and older, to report their health as very good, and to have medical insurance and at least one source of primary care compared to non-metropolitan women. After controlling for related variables, residence was not associated with the screening practices, with the exception of breast physical examination; farm women were less likely to have a recent examination than metropolitan women (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.07-2.10). When non-metropolitan and farm women were combined, there was no association between residence and having had a physical breast examination. There were important differences between non-metropolitan women and farm women in demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, which influenced screening practices. Further studies are needed to examine farm residents' cancer screening practices separately from other rural residents in order to fully understand the implications of these differences for health status in other geographic areas..
机译:由于农民的独特性,将农场居民和非农业农村居民合并为一个农村类别可能会掩盖预防保健利用的差异,包括各组的癌症筛查实践。这项研究比较了科罗拉多州妇女的三个居住群体(都市,非都市和农场)的三种癌症筛查方法(乳房X线摄影,乳房体格检查和子宫颈抹片检查),并描述了这些人群的人口统计学和社会经济特征。在1993年科罗拉多州行为危险因素监视系统(BRFSS)中接受采访的女性分为大都市或非都市居民。农场居民是在1993年至1997年进行的科罗拉多州农场家庭健康与危害调查(CFFHHS)的一部分中接受采访的女性受访者。进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定与筛选实践相关的特征。与非都市妇女相比,农场妇女更有可能是非西班牙裔白人和大龄妇女,他们的健康状况良好,并拥有医疗保险和至少一种初级保健来源。在控制了相关变量之后,除了乳房体格检查外,居住与筛查方法无关。农场女性比大城市女性接受近期检查的可能性更低(OR = 1.50,95%CI = 1.07-2.10)。当非都市妇女和农场妇女结合在一起时,居住和进行身体乳房检查之间没有关联。非都市妇女和农场妇女在人口和社会经济特征方面存在重要差异,这影响了筛查做法。为了进一步了解这些差异对其他地理区域健康状况的影响,还需要进行进一步的研究,以与其他农村居民分开检查农场居民的癌症筛查方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号