...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries >Grid-based individual risk calculation in the classification of hazardous area with a risk-based approach
【24h】

Grid-based individual risk calculation in the classification of hazardous area with a risk-based approach

机译:基于风险的方法在危险区域分类中基于网格的个人风险计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The energy institute model code of safe practice, part15, 2005 (EI15) is one of the most widely-used practices in studies of hazardous area classification, which adopts a risk-based approach in order to determine the hole size of secondary grade sources of release (such as valves, flanges, and pumps). Employing an average parameter for the whole unit, the approach determines the number of effective release sources, affecting an individual in hazardous area, within its risk calculation. In case of high dissipation among the number of secondary grade sources of release in different locations of a plant, such an average value ends up overestimating the risk for hole sizes where there are few release sources or in case of places in which there are many release sources, it results in an underestimation of the risk. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a grid-based approach to calculate the exact value of the risk from secondary grade sources of release, in order to determine the accuracy of such a practice. In its risk calculations, the proposed approach uses the accurate number of effective secondary grade sources of release in each location of the plant, instead of an average number. For so doing, the hole sizes from secondary grade sources of release are calculated for a gas dehydration and dew point control of natural gas unit by means of EI15 approach for risk calculation. Afterwards it calculates the risk of the releases with different hole sizes by means of the grid-based approach on the intended, unit, specifying the appropriate hole size for secondary grade sources of release in different areas of the intended unit. It then compares the results of zone 2 from both approaches, in turn measuring the error rate of EI15 approach as it determines the hole size of secondary grade sources of release. Eventually, it is proposed that utilizing multiple average values for the number of effective release sources in different parts of the unit will increase the precision of EI15. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:能源研究所《安全操作规程范本》(2005年第15部分)(EI15)是危险区域分类研究中使用最广泛的操作之一,该方法采用基于风险的方法来确定二次生源的孔尺寸释放(例如阀门,法兰和泵)。该方法采用整个装置的平均参数,在其风险计算中确定影响危险区域中个人的有效释放源数量。如果工厂不同位置的二级释放源中的消散率很高,则该平均值最终会高估释放源很少或释放量很多的孔尺寸的风险资料来源,这会导致对风险的低估。因此,本文旨在提出一种基于网格的方法来计算二级释放源的风险的准确值,以确定这种做法的准确性。在风险计算中,建议的方法使用工厂每个位置的有效二级排放源的准确数量,而不是平均数量。为此,通过EI15方法计算天然气单元的气体脱水和露点,从而计算出二级释放源的孔径。然后,它通过对目标单元使用基于网格的方法来计算具有不同孔径的释放风险,并为目标单元不同区域中的二级释放源指定适当的孔径。然后,它比较两种方法的区域2的结果,进而测量EI15方法的错误率,因为它确定了二级释放源的孔尺寸。最终,建议在单元的不同部分中使用多个平均值作为有效释放源的数量将提高EI15的精度。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号