首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management >Unified assembly- and disassembly-line model formulae
【24h】

Unified assembly- and disassembly-line model formulae

机译:统一的装配线和拆卸线模型公式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - There is a rich body of literature on sequencing assembly and on sequencing disassembly, but little that either fuses or contrasts the two, which may be valuable for long-range planning in the closed-loop supply chain and simply convenient in terms of consistency in nomenclature and mathematical formulations. The purpose of this paper is to concisely unify and summarize assembly and disassembly formulae - as well as to add new formulations for completeness - and then demonstrate the similarities and differences between assembly and disassembly. Design/methodology/approach - Along with several familiar assembly-line formulae which are adapted here for disassembly, five (two specific and three general) metrics and a comparative performance formula from disassembly-line balancing are proposed for use in assembly- and disassemblyline sequencing and balancing either directly, through generalization, or with some extension. The size of assembly and disassembly search spaces are also quantified and formulated. Three new metrics are then developed from each of the general metrics to demonstrate the process of using these general formulae as prototypes. Findings - The three new metrics along with several of the original metrics are selectively applied to a simple, notional case study product to be sequenced on an assembly line and then on a disassembly line. Using these analytical results, the inherent differences between assembly and disassembly, even for a seemingly trivial product, are illustrated. Originality/value - The research adds several new assembly/disassembly metrics, a case study, unifies the evaluation formulae that assembly and disassembly hold in common as well as structuring prototype formulae for flexibility in generating new evaluation criteria for both, and quantifies (using the case study) how assembly and disassembly - while certainly possessing similarities - also demonstrate measurable differences that can be expected to affect product design, planning, production, and end-of-life processing.
机译:目的-关于序列装配和序列拆卸的文献很多,但很少融合或对比这两者,这对于闭环供应链中的长期计划可能很有价值,并且在一致性方面很方便以术语和数学公式表示。本文的目的是简洁地统一和总结组装和拆卸公式,并添加新的公式以确保完整性,然后证明组装和拆卸之间的异同。设计/方法/方法-结合此处适用于拆卸的几个熟悉的装配线公式,提出了五个(两个特定的和三个通用的)度量标准以及来自拆卸线平衡的比较性能公式,用于装配和拆卸线排序并通过一般化或扩展进行直接平衡。组装和拆卸搜索空间的大小也被量化和制定。然后,从每个常规指标中开发出三个新的指标,以演示使用这些常规公式作为原型的过程。结果-将这三个新指标以及几个原始指标选择性地应用于简单的,名义上的案例研究产品,以在装配线上然后在拆卸线上进行排序。使用这些分析结果,可以说明组装和拆卸之间的固有差异,即使对于看似微不足道的产品也是如此。原创性/价值-该研究增加了几个新的组装/拆卸指标,一个案例研究,统一了组装和拆卸通用的评估公式以及构造原型公式以灵活地为两者生成新的评估标准,并量化(使用案例研究)尽管组装和拆卸当然具有相似性,但它们也显示出可测量的差异,这些差异有望影响产品设计,计划,生产和报废处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号