...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science >Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Detection of Coronary Artery Disease according to Framingham Risk Score in Populations with Low to Intermediate Risks
【24h】

Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Detection of Coronary Artery Disease according to Framingham Risk Score in Populations with Low to Intermediate Risks

机译:根据中低风险人群的弗雷明汉风险评分,冠状动脉钙评分在检测冠状动脉疾病中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current guidelines recommend that coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening should only be used for intermediate risk groups (Framingham risk score [FRS] of 10%-20%). The CAC distributions and coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence in various FRS strata were determined. The benefit to lower risk populations of CAC score-based screening was also assessed. In total, 1,854 participants (aged 40-79 years) without history of CAD, stroke, or diabetes were enrolled. CAC scores of > 0, >= 100, and >= 300 were present in 33.8%, 8.2%, and 2.9% of the participants, respectively. The CAC scores rose significantly as the FRS grew more severe (P < 0.01). The total CAD prevalence was 6.1%. The occult CAD prevalence in the FRS <= 5%, 6%-10%, 11%-20%, and > 20% strata were 3.4%, 6.7%, 9.0%, and 11.6% (P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting, not only the intermediate and high risk groups but also the low risk (FRS 6%-10%) group had significantly increased odds ratio for occult CAD compared to the very low-risk (FRS <= 5%) group (1.89 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.09-3.29] in FRS 6%-10%; 2.48 [95% CI, 1.47-4.20] in FRS 11%-20%; and 3.10 [95% CI, 1.75-5.47] in FRS > 20%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the yield of screening for significant CAC and occult CAD is low in the very low risk population but it rises in low and intermediate risk populations.
机译:当前的指南建议仅对中等风险组(Framingham风险评分[FRS]为10%-20%)使用冠状动脉钙(CAC)筛查。确定了各种FRS阶层的CAC分布和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患病率。还评估了基于CAC评分的筛查对低风险人群的益处。总共有1,854名参与者(年龄在40-79岁之间)没有CAD,中风或糖尿病史。分别有33.8%,8.2%和2.9%的参与者具有> 0,> = 100和> = 300的CAC评分。随着FRS变得越来越严重,CAC评分显着上升(P <0.01)。 CAD总患病率为6.1%。 FRS <= 5%,6%-10%,11%-20%和> 20%层的隐匿性CAD患病率分别为3.4%,6.7%,9.0%和11.6%(P <0.001)。在多元逻辑回归分析调整中,与极低风险(FRS <= 5%)相比,不仅中风险和高风险组,而且低风险(FRS 6%-10%)组的隐匿性CAD的优势比均显着增加。 )组(FRS 6%-10%中的1.89 [95%置信区间,CI,1.09-3.29]; FRS 11%-20%中的2.48 [95%CI,1.47-4.20];以及3.10 [95%CI,1.75 -5.47],FRS> 20%; P <0.05)。总之,在非常低风险的人群中筛查大量CAC和隐匿性CAD的产率较低,而在中低风险人群中筛查的产率却较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号