首页> 外文期刊>Coal Age >Asbestos Litigation Should Concern Coal Mine Operators
【24h】

Asbestos Litigation Should Concern Coal Mine Operators

机译:石棉诉讼应关注煤矿经营者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The wide use of asbestos in the first 70 years or so of the 20th century, and the subsequent damages suffered by people from their exposure to it, brought a wave of litigation during the last 15 to 20 years. Many people know that products used in high-temperature operations contained asbestos, due to its resistance to extreme heat. There was a time when asbestos-containing products (ACPs) were common in almost everyday life. When it was learned that asbestos can play a role in causing various diseases and ailments, the use of it began to disappear. The diseases and ailments which are attributable to asbestos can be divided into two types, malignant and non-malignant. Malignancies are various cancers that may result in death. They also tend to have long latency periods before appearing. Non-malignancies are, broadly speaking, various respiratory problems which, while generally non-fatal, can cause discomfort, quality of life problems, and pain and suffering. Asbestos litigation is couched primarily in two legal theories and, to a lesser degree, a third. The primary theories are product liability and premises liability, with the third being intentional torts.
机译:在20世纪前70年代左右,石棉的广泛使用以及人们因接触石棉而遭受的后续损失在最近15至20年间掀起了诉讼浪潮。许多人知道,高温操作中使用的产品由于具有极高的耐热性而含有石棉。曾经有一段时间,几乎在日常生活中都含有石棉产品(ACP)。当得知石棉可以在引起各种疾病和疾病中起作用时,对石棉的使用开始消失。石棉引起的疾病可以分为恶性和非恶性两种。恶性肿瘤是可能导致死亡的各种癌症。它们在出现之前也往往具有较长的等待时间。从广义上讲,非恶性肿瘤是各种呼吸系统疾病,尽管通常是非致命性的,但会引起不适,生活质量问题以及疼痛和痛苦。石棉诉讼主要涉及两种法律理论,较小程度上涉及第三种法律理论。主要理论是产品责任和前提责任,第三个理论是故意侵权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号