首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >What do we really know about VBID? Quality of the evidence and ethical considerations for health plan sponsors.
【24h】

What do we really know about VBID? Quality of the evidence and ethical considerations for health plan sponsors.

机译:我们真的对VBID有什么了解?卫生计划发起人的证据质量和道德考量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The AHRQ's envisioned role for accurate and transparent data in developing and monitoring a redesigned health care system represents an optimal scenario-if health care research "builds it," policymakers "will come." Yet, the ways in which health plan sponsors actually obtain and use information in making benefit design decisions may not match this expectation. A Diamond Management/Willis North America survey of large and small employers in a variety of industry sectors, conducted after passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) using an unreported sampling methodology, found that a slight majority (736 of 1,400, 52.6%) of respondents cited "in-house personnel" as their primary source of information about "the health care reform statute or regulations."2 Insurance brokers and carriers were cited as a primary information source by 25.1% and 6.6%, respectively. Only 5.2% said that their primary information source was "free resources and tools as published by government agencies."
机译:AHRQ在开发和监视经过重新设计的医疗保健系统中为准确,透明的数据而设想的角色代表了一种最佳方案:如果医疗保健研究“建立起来”,政策制定者“将会来临”。然而,健康计划发起人在进行福利设计决策时实际获得和使用信息的方式可能与这一期望不符。在《患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》(PPACA)通过后,使用未报告的抽样方法进行的一项钻石管理/威利斯北美公司对各种行业大大小小的雇主的调查发现,一小部分人(1,400名, 52.6%)的受访者将“内部人员”作为其有关“医疗改革法规或法规”的主要信息来源。2保险经纪人和承运人分别被作为主要信息来源,分别为25.1%和6.6%。只有5.2%的人说他们的主要信息来源是“政府机构发布的免费资源和工具”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号