首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Land and Rural Studies >Policy versus Performance: Auditing Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation in Odisha
【24h】

Policy versus Performance: Auditing Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation in Odisha

机译:政策与绩效:审计奥里萨邦的土地收购和恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

India's constitutional audit institution (CAG of India) has undertaken performance reviews of the land acquisition and rehabilitation process in rapidly industrialising Odisha in last few years. In this article, we combine audit findings on both fronts and pose questions on how audited entity, legislators and communities responded to these audit findings.Three performance reviews of land acquisition process in Odisha including a comprehensive audit of land acquired for Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO) spanning the years between 2001 and 2012 provides insights into lapses committed often by administrators such as land acquisition officers (LAOs), DCs etc. during land acquisition process. Similarly, performance review on rehabilitation of people affected by industrial projects provides insights into lapses in implementing Odisha Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) Policy, 2006. This article argues why activists and researchers need to engage with audit findings and ask crucial questions on the follow up processes on these audit findings.
机译:近几年,印度的宪法审核机构(印度的CAG)已对奥里萨邦快速工业化过程中的土地征用和恢复过程进行了绩效评估。在本文中,我们结合了这两个方面的审计结果,并提出了有关被审计实体,立法者和社区如何回应这些审计结果的问题。奥里萨邦(Odisha)的土地购置过程的三个绩效评估,包括对奥里萨邦工业基础设施开发公司所购土地的全面审核(IDCO)涵盖了2001年至2012年之间的年份,可深入了解土地征用过程中由行政管理人员(例如土地收购官(LAO),区议会等)经常犯下的失误。同样,对受工业项目影响的人们进行康复的绩效评估可洞悉在实施2006年《奥里萨邦移民与康复(R&R)政策》中的失误。本文提出了为什么维权人士和研究人员需要参与审计发现并就后续行动提出关键问题的问题这些审计结果的流程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号