首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interprofessional care >Linking integrative medicine with interprofessional education and care initiatives: challenges and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration.
【24h】

Linking integrative medicine with interprofessional education and care initiatives: challenges and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration.

机译:将中西医结合专业间的教育和护理举措:专业间合作的挑战和机遇。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the fields of interprofessional education and collaboration (IPE/IPC) and integrative medicine (IM) are both recognised and clearly advancing as of late, a curious paradox exists: IPE/IPC and IM are both concerned with communicating about and attempting to resolve differences between healthcare professions with the fundamental goal of improving patient outcomes, yet they have remained quite distinct fields of research. This disconnect could be due to the fact that one field deals with integration within the general paradigm of biomedicine (IPE/IPC), while the other addresses integration across paradigms (IM). It is an opportune time for a critical comparison between the two. First, the main themes of IM are summarised as they are reflected in the IM literature. Second, a comparative analysis is presented focusing on the significant similarities and differences between IPE/IPC and IM. The final section addresses the question: What key learning areas from IM could benefit and enhance IPE/IPC?
机译:尽管跨专业教育与合作(IPE / IPC)和中西医结合(IM)领域都得到认可并明显地向前发展,但存在一个奇怪的悖论:IPE / IPC和IM都关心沟通和尝试解决差异医疗保健专业人士之间的基本目标是改善患者的治疗效果,但是它们仍然是非常不同的研究领域。这种脱节可能是由于一个领域涉及生物医学的一般范式(IPE / IPC)内的整合,而另一个领域涉及跨范式(IM)的整合这一事实。现在是时候对两者进行严格的比较了。首先,对IM的主要主题进行了概述,因为它们反映在IM文献中。其次,针对IPE / IPC与IM之间的重大异同进行了比较分析。最后一部分讨论了以下问题:IM的哪些关键学习领域可以使IPE / IPC受益并增强?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号