首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Dissection of the appendix with ultrasound-activated scalpel: an experimental study in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.
【24h】

Dissection of the appendix with ultrasound-activated scalpel: an experimental study in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.

机译:超声手术刀解剖阑尾:小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术的实验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine mechanical, microbiologic, and morphologic changes of the appendicle rim to assess if it is appropriate to dissect the appendix with the ultrasound-activated scalpel (UAS) during laparoscopic appendectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After laparoscopic resection of the appendix, using conventional Roeder slings, we investigated 50 appendicle rims with an in vitro procedure. The overall time of dissection of the mesoappendix with UAS was noted. Following removal, the appendix was dissected in vitro with the UAS one cme from the resection rim. Seal-burst pressures were recorded. Bacterial cultures of the UAS-resected rim were compared with those of the scissors resected rim. Tissue changes were quantified histologically with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stains. RESULTS: The average time to dissect the mesoappendix was 228 seconds (25-900). Bacterial culture growths were less in the UAS-resected probes (7 versus 36 positive probes; (p > 0.01). HE-stained tissues revealed mean histologic changes in the lamina propria muscularis externa of 2 mm depth. The seal-burst pressure levels of the appendicle lumen had a mean of 420 mbar. Seal-burst pressures and depths of histologic changes were not dependent on the different stages of appendicitis investigated, gender, or age groups. Seal-burst pressure levels were not related to different depths of tissue changes (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The UAS is a rapid instrument for laparoscopic appendectomy and appears to be safe with respect to stability, sterility and tissue changes. It avoids complex time consuming instrument change manoeuvres and current transmission, which may induce intra- and postoperative complications. Our results suggest that keeping a safety margin of at least 5 mm from the bowel would be sufficient to avoid thermal damage.
机译:摘要背景:这项研究的目的是检查阑尾边缘的机械,微生物和形态变化,以评估在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中用超声手术刀(UAS)解剖阑尾是否合适。材料与方法:在腹腔镜下切除阑尾后,使用常规的Roeder悬带,我们通过体外方法研究了50个阑尾边缘。记录了用UAS解剖中阑尾的总时间。取出后,用UAS在离切除边缘一厘米处进行体外解剖阑尾。记录密封爆破压力。将UAS切除的轮辋的细菌培养与剪刀切除的轮辋的细菌培养进行比较。用苏木精和曙红(HE)染色在组织学上定量组织变化。结果:解剖中膜的平均时间为228秒(25-900)。 UAS切除探针的细菌培养物生长较少(7相对于36阳性探针;(p> 0.01)。HE染色的组织显示2 mm深的固有肌层固有组织学平均改变。阑尾腔的平均压力为420 mbar;海豹突触压力和组织学改变的深度与所研究的阑尾炎的不同阶段,性别或年龄无关;海豹突触压力的水平与组织改变的不同深度无关(P = 0.64)结论:UAS是一种用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术的快速器械,在稳定性,无菌性和组织改变方面似乎是安全的,它避免了耗时的器械改变操作和电流传输,从而避免了可能导致内,内和外伤的发生。术后并发症:我们的结果表明,与肠保持至少5 mm的安全裕度足以避免热损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号