...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >On the political economy of land reforms in the former soviet union
【24h】

On the political economy of land reforms in the former soviet union

机译:论前苏联土地改革的政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While all transition countries have chosen to reform land property rights as part of their reform strategies, the procedures chosen and the implementation has differed strongly among transition countries. For example, countries such as the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia have restituted farmland to former owners who lost their land during the collectivization process. Others have distributed farmland among rural households (Albania) have sold and leased farmland (Poland), used share distribution systems (Russia) or voucher procedures (Hungary) to privatize (part of the) farmland. In several Countries more than one procedure was used. Elsewhere we have forwarded a series of hypotheses on the reasons behind the differences in land reform procedures in Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs), using a political economy framework (Swinnen, 1999). The study did not cover land reform procedures in the countries of the former Soviet Union (FSU), except for the Balties. In FSU countries, land reform differs significantly in procedure and lags behind in progress compared to the CEECs (see Table I). In many FSU countries, land property rights are distributed to rural households under the form of land shares (see further). This procedure results in incomplete individual property rights and creates important constraints on access to land for potential farmers. Many studies have noted the lagging reform progress in the former Soviet Union compared with the CEECs. This is well captured by the following quote from Lerman (20(111 pp. 1-2): There is sometimes a feeling that the cold-War iron curtain has been replaced by another 'east/west divide', which now lies further east, along the borders of what has become known as the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a political entity compromising the 12 successor republics of the former Soviet Union (excluding the Baltic states). . .. The countries west of the divide, which include the former Comecon members in CEE and ... the Baltics, are applying for accession to the European Union and are making plans to join... NATO. ... The CIS countries east of the divide remain introvert and relatively isolated from the rest of Europe, viewing the west with undisguised suspicion.
机译:尽管所有转型国家都选择改革土地产权作为其改革战略的一部分,但转型国家之间选择的程序和实施方式却存在很大差异。例如,捷克共和国,斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚等国家已将耕地归还给在集体化过程中失去土地的前所有人。其他人则在农村家庭中分配耕地(阿尔巴尼亚),已出售和租赁耕地(波兰),使用股份分配系统(俄罗斯)或凭证程序(匈牙利)私有化(部分)农田。在一些国家,使用了不止一种程序。在其他地方,我们使用政治经济学框架提出了一系列关于中欧和东欧国家(CEEC)土地改革程序差异背后原因的假设(Swinnen,1999)。该研究报告未涵盖前苏联国家(土地联盟)中的土地改革程序。与中东欧国家相比,在前苏联国家中,土地改革的程序差异很大,并且进展滞后(见表一)。在许多FSU国家中,土地财产权是以土地份额的形式分配给农村家庭的(详见下文)。该程序导致个人财产权不完整,并对潜在农民的土地使用权产生了重要限制。许多研究指出,与CEEC相比,前苏联的改革进展缓慢。莱曼(Lerman)(20(111 pp。1-2))的以下引言很好地说明了这一点:有时会感觉到冷战铁幕已被另一个“东西向分界线”所取代,后者现在位于更东边沿已被称为独立国家联合体(CIS)的边界的政治实体,它损害了前苏联的12个继承共和国(不包括波罗的海国家)。包括中欧和东欧的前Comecon成员和……波罗的海国家,正在申请加入欧盟,并正在计划加入……北约。……鸿沟以东的独联体国家仍然内向且相对孤立。欧洲其他地区,毫不掩饰地怀疑西方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号