首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Accurate placement of central venous catheters using a 16-cm catheter.
【24h】

Accurate placement of central venous catheters using a 16-cm catheter.

机译:使用16厘米导管准确放置中央静脉导管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We determine if use of 16-cm central venous catheters (CVC) minimizes dangerous intracardiac catheter placements. We conducted a prospective study in a large community teaching hospital. Consecutive patients (n = 127) who required a CVC via either the internal jugular (IJV) or the subclavian vein (SCV) were assessed using 16 (n = 102) or 20-cm (n = 25) catheters. The main outcome measurements were (1) intracardiac placement of central venous catheters, and (2) relationship of right- or left-sided internal jugular or subclavian vein insertions to intracardiac catheter placement. Use of a 20-cm CVC resulted in 14 of 25 (56%) intracardiac placements compared with 11 of 102 (11%) using a 16-cm catheter (p < 0.0001). All intracardiac placements with the 16-cm CVC were from right-sided approaches: IJV 7 of 38 (16%), SCV 4 of 18 (18%). Use of a 16-cm CVC to access the central circulation from either the SCV or the IJV results in a significantly greater proportion of safe catheter placements than using longer CVCs, and it should become the standard of care.
机译:我们确定使用16厘米中心静脉导管(CVC)是否可以最大程度地减少危险的心内导管放置。我们在一家大型社区教学医院进行了一项前瞻性研究。连续患者(n = 127)需要通过颈内(IJV)或锁骨下静脉(SCV)进行CVC,使用16根(n = 102)或20厘米(n = 25)导管进行评估。主要的结局指标是(1)中心静脉导管的心脏内放置,以及(2)右侧或左侧颈内或锁骨下静脉插入与心脏内导管放置的关系。使用20厘米CVC会导致25个心脏内放置14个(56%),而使用16厘米导管的102个却有11个(11%)(p <0.0001)。所有心内放置16 cm CVC的患者均来自右侧入路:IJV 7为38(16%),SCV 4为18(18%)。与使用较长的CVC相比,使用16厘米的CVC从SCV或IJV进入中央循环会导致安全导管置入的比例明显增加,这应成为护理的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号