首页> 外文期刊>Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology >Comparison of the estimation capabilities of response surface methodology and artificial neural network for the optimization of recombinant lipase production by E. coli BL21.
【24h】

Comparison of the estimation capabilities of response surface methodology and artificial neural network for the optimization of recombinant lipase production by E. coli BL21.

机译:响应面方法和人工神经网络的估计能力的比较,用于通过 E优化重组脂肪酶的生产。大肠菌 BL21。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) were used to optimize the effect of four independent variables, namely glucose, sodium chloride (NaCl), temperature and induction time, on lipase production by a recombinant Escherichia coli BL21. The optimization and prediction capabilities of RSM and ANN were then compared. RSM predicted the dependent variable with a good coefficient of correlation determination (R2) and adjusted R2 values for the model. Although the R2 value showed a good fit, absolute average deviation (AAD) and root mean square error (RMSE) values did not support the accuracy of the model and this was due to the inferiority in predicting the values towards the edges of the design points. In contrast, ANN-predicted values were closer to the observed values with better R2, adjusted R2, AAD and RMSE values and this was due to the capability of predicting the values throughout the selected range of the design points. Similar to RSM, ANN could also be used to rank the effect of variables. However, ANN could not predict the interactive effect between the variables as performed by RSM. The optimum levels for glucose, NaCl, temperature and induction time predicted by RSM are 32 g/L, 5 g/L, 32 degrees C and 2.12 h, respectively, and those by ANN are 25 g/L, 3 g/L, 30 degrees C and 2 h, respectively. The ANN-predicted optimal levels gave higher lipase activity (55.8 IU/mL) as compared to RSM-predicted levels (50.2 IU/mL) and the predicted lipase activity was also closer to the observed data at these levels, suggesting that ANN is a better optimization method than RSM for lipase production by the recombinant strain.
机译:响应面方法(RSM)和人工神经网络(ANN)用于优化四个独立变量,即葡萄糖,氯化钠(NaCl),温度和诱导时间,对重组大肠杆菌产生脂肪酶的影响。 / i> BL21。然后比较了RSM和ANN的优化和预测能力。 RSM预测了具有良好相关性确定系数( R 2 )的因变量,并调整了 R 2 的值该模型。尽管 R 2 值显示出很好的拟合度,但是绝对平均偏差(AAD)和均方根误差(RMSE)值不支持模型的准确性,这是由于在朝向设计点的边缘预测值时的劣势。相比之下,ANN预测值更接近于观察值,具有更好的 R 2 ,调整后的 R 2 , AAD和RMSE值,这是由于能够在所选设计点范围内预测值。与RSM相似,ANN也可以用于对变量的影响进行排名。但是,ANN无法预测RSM执行的变量之间的交互作用。 RSM预测的最佳葡萄糖,NaCl,温度和诱导时间的最佳水平分别为32 g / L,5 g / L,32摄氏度和2.12 h,而ANN的最佳水平为25 g / L,3 g / L, 30摄氏度和2小时。与RSM预测的水平(50.2 IU / mL)相比,ANN预测的最佳水平具有更高的脂肪酶活性(55.8 IU / mL),并且在这些水平下预测的脂肪酶活性也更接近于观察到的数据,表明ANN是一种重组菌株生产脂肪酶的方法比RSM更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号