...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health services research & policy >Demand-side strategies to deal with moral hazard in public insurance for long-term care
【24h】

Demand-side strategies to deal with moral hazard in public insurance for long-term care

机译:应对长期护理中公共保险中道德风险的需求方策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Moral hazard in public insurance for long-term care may be counteracted by strategies influencing supply or demand. Demand-side strategies may target the patient or the insurer. Various demand-side strategies and how they are implemented in four European countries (Germany, Belgium, Switzerland and the Netherlands) are described, highlighting the pros and cons of each strategy. Patient-oriented strategies to counteract moral hazard are used in all four countries but their impact on efficiency is unclear and crucially depends on their design. Strategies targeted at insurers are much less popular: Belgium and Switzerland have introduced elements of managed competition for some types of long-term care, as has the Netherlands in 2015. As only some elements of managed competition have been introduced, it is unclear whether it improves efficiency. Its effect will depend on the feasibility of setting appropriate financial incentives for insurers using risk equalization and the willingness of governments to provide insurers with instruments to manage long-term care.
机译:长期护理的公共保险中的道德风险可以通过影响供应或需求的策略来抵消。需求方策略可能针对患者或保险公司。描述了各种需求方策略及其在四个欧洲国家(德国,比利时,瑞士和荷兰)的实施方式,着重介绍了每种策略的利弊。在所有四个国家中都采用了以患者为中心的策略来应对道德风险,但是这些策略对效率的影响尚不清楚,并且关键取决于其设计。针对保险公司的策略不那么受欢迎:比利时和瑞士引入了某些类型的长期护理管理竞争的要素,荷兰在2015年也引入了管理竞争的要素。由于仅引入了管理竞争的某些要素,目前尚不清楚提高效率。其效果将取决于使用风险均等化为保险公司设置适当的财务激励措施的可行性,以及政府是否愿意为保险公司提供管理长期护理的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号