首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Runoff forecasting for an asphalt plane by Artificial Neural Networks and comparisons with kinematic wave and autoregressive moving average models
【24h】

Runoff forecasting for an asphalt plane by Artificial Neural Networks and comparisons with kinematic wave and autoregressive moving average models

机译:用人工神经网络预测沥青飞机的径流以及与运动波和自回归滑动平均模型的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Event-based runoff forecasting for 1, 2, 4 and 8 time steps ahead, based on rainfall and flow data of ten storm events for an asphalt plane, have been investigated by the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) technique. The investigation includes ANN models with three different types of inputs: (i) rainfall only, (ii) discharge only and (iii) a combination of rainfall and discharge. The results show that inclusion of discharge as an input in general, improved the performance of the ANN. However, model improvements were less significant for longer forecast lead times. Significant time shift errors in the predicted hydrographs were observed for ANN models that used discharge only as input. Although ANN models with the smallest time shift errors were models that included rainfall as inputs, these models produced hydrographs that were noisier. ANN model results were also evaluated by comparisons with results from the kinematic wave (KW) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models. It was found that ANN model forecasts compared favorably with runoff predictions by the KW and ARMA models. Specifically, ANN models that included discharge as input were superior to the KW model for all forecast ranges. However, the inclusion of discharge as an input to the ANN models implies that discharge measurements must be available during the model simulation stage; the KW model does not have this requirement. ANN models that did not include discharge as an input were better at long-term forecasts but poorer at short-term forecasts, when compared to the KW model. The poorer performance of the KW model at longer lead times is probably due to errors in the forecast rainfall used.
机译:人工神经网络(ANN)技术已经研究了基于沥青路面十次暴雨事件的降雨和流量数据对未来1、2、4和8个时间步长进行基于事件的径流预测。该调查包括具有三种不同类型输入的ANN模型:(i)仅降雨,(ii)仅排放和(iii)降雨和排放的组合。结果表明,通常将放电作为输入包括在内,可以改善ANN的性能。但是,对于更长的预测交货时间,模型改进的意义不大。对于仅使用流量作为输入的ANN模型,在预测的水位图中观察到了明显的时移误差。尽管时移误差最小的ANN模型是将降雨作为输入的模型,但是这些模型产生的水位图噪声更大。还通过与运动波(KW)和自回归移动平均(ARMA)模型的结果进行比较来评估ANN模型的结果。结果发现,与KW模型和ARMA模型的径流预测相比,ANN模型的预测具有优势。具体而言,在所有预测范围内,包括流量作为输入的ANN模型均优于KW模型。但是,将排放量作为ANN模型的输入包括在内,意味着在模型仿真阶段必须提供排放量测量。 KW模型没有此要求。与KW模型相比,不包括排放量作为输入的ANN模型在长期预测中较好,但在短期预测中较差。 KW模型在较长交货时间内的较差性能可能是由于所使用的预测降雨量存在误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号