首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA
【24h】

Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA

机译:在美国东北部的一个高山湖泊中使用15种蒸发方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Few detailed evaporation studies exist for small takes or reservoirs in mountainous settings. A detailed evaporation study was conducted at Mirror Lake, a 0.15 km(2) take in New Hampshire, northeastern USA, as part of a long-term investigation of take hydrology. Evaporation was determined using 14 alternate evaporation methods during six open-water seasons and compared with values from the Bowen-ratio energy-budget (BREB) method, considered the standard. Values from the Priestley-Taylor, deBruin-Keijman, and Penman methods compared most favorably with BREB-determined values. Differences from BREB values averaged 0.19, 0.27, and 0.20 mm d(-1), respectively, and results were within 20% of BREB values during more than 90% of the 37 monthly comparison periods. All three methods require measurement of net radiation, air temperature, change in heat stored in the take, and vapor pressure, making them relatively data intensive. Several of the methods had substantial bias when compared with BREB values and were subsequently modified to eliminate bias. Methods that rely only on measurement of air temperature, or air temperature and solar radiation, were relatively cost-effective options for measuring evaporation at this small. New England take, outperforming some methods that require measurement of a greater number of variables. It is likely that the atmosphere above Mirror Lake was affected by occasional formation of separation eddies on the Lee side of nearby high terrain, although those influences do not appear to be significant to measured evaporation from the Lake when averaged over monthly periods. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:很少有关于山区小水库或水库的详细蒸发研究。在美国东北部新罕布什尔州0.15公里(2)的镜湖上进行了详细的蒸发研究,这是对水文学进行长期调查的一部分。在六个开放水季中,使用14种替代蒸发方法确定了蒸发量,并将其与标准的鲍文比能量预算(BREB)方法的值进行了比较。 Priestley-Taylor,deBruin-Keijman和Penman方法的值与BREB确定的值相比最有利。与BREB值的差异分别平均为0.19、0.27和0.20 mm d(-1),在37个月比较期间的90%以上期间,结果均在BREB值的20%以内。所有这三种方法都需要测量净辐射,空气温度,假装中存储的热量变化和蒸汽压力,这使它们相对需要大量数据。与BREB值相比,其中几种方法存在较大偏差,随后对其进行了改进以消除偏差。仅依赖于测量空气温度,空气温度和太阳辐射的方法是在这种情况下测量蒸发量的相对划算的选择。新英格兰的做法胜过某些需要测量更多变量的方法。 Mirror Lake上方的大气很可能受到附近高地形Lee一侧偶尔形成的分离涡的影响,尽管按月平均计算,这些影响对于从湖中测得的蒸发量似乎并不重要。 (C)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号