...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >The analytical derivation of multiple elasticities of runoff to climate change and catchment characteristics alteration
【24h】

The analytical derivation of multiple elasticities of runoff to climate change and catchment characteristics alteration

机译:径流多重弹性对气候变化和流域特征变化的解析推导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of elasticity has been widely employed to quantify the hydrological response to changes in climate and catchments properties. To separate the effect of different climatic variables on runoff, the potential evaporation (E-0) elasticity of runoff needs to be presented in term of observed climate variables. To fully reflect the effects of maximum and minimum temperatures and reduce the influence of the correlations of radiation with sunshine duration and relative humidity on the assessment results, we decompose the E-0 elasticity into five evaporation-related elasticities (i.e., sunshine duration, maximum and minimum temperature, wind speed and relative humidity) via the first-order differentiation of the FAO 56 Penman equation. As the catchment runoff is frequently affected by the land use/cover change, we also consider changes in catchment characteristics and derive a catchment alteration elasticity based on the Budyko framework. An application was carried out in 30 catchments with widespread climatic types in China. For the two periods (i.e., the baseline period and the changed period) divided by the Pettitt test, the contributions of different climatic variables and land use/cover conditions to runoff change were quantified. In general, the alteration of catchment characteristics and climatic change should be mainly responsible for changes in runoff in water-limited and humid basins, respectively. Although the elasticity of maximum temperature are usually higher than that of minimum temperature, the contributions to runoff change present the opposite direction. Furthermore, additional analysis indicated some overestimation in relative humidity elasticities in the previous studies, further emphasizing the necessity of our extension to alleviate the influence of correlation between climatic variables to the assessment results. Moreover, the results of model performance versus model complexity showed that the choice of model complexity still depends on the goal in the climatic and anthropogenic effects on runoff. If the climatic effect as a whole was of interest, the method based on two parameters elasticities would be more applicable compared to that based on multi-parameter elasticities because the simple model provides higher confidence in modelling the overall change in runoff. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:弹性的概念已被广泛用于量化对气候变化和流域特性的水文响应。为了区分不同气候变量对径流的影响,需要用观测到的气候变量来表示径流的潜在蒸发弹性(E-0)。为了充分反映最高和最低温度的影响并减少辐射与日照时长和相对湿度之间的关系对评估结果的影响,我们将E-0弹性分解为五个与蒸发有关的弹性(即日照时长,最大日照时间)以及最低温度,风速和相对湿度)通过FAO 56 Penman方程的一阶微分。由于集水径流经常受到土地利用/覆盖变化的影响,我们也考虑集水特征的变化,并基于Budyko框架得出集水变化弹性。在中国30个气候类型广泛的流域进行了申请。对于两个时期(即基线期和变化期)除以Pettitt检验,量化了不同气候变量和土地利用/覆盖条件对径流变化的贡献。通常,集水区特征和气候变化的变化应分别负责缺水盆地和潮湿盆地的径流变化。尽管最高温度的弹性通常高于最低温度,但对径流变化的贡献却呈现相反的方向。此外,额外的分析表明在先前的研究中相对湿度弹性有些高估,进一步强调了我们扩展以减轻气候变量之间的相关性对评估结果的影响的必要性。此外,模型性能与模型复杂性的结果表明,模型复杂性的选择仍然取决于径流的气候和人为影响目标。如果整体上对气候影响感兴趣,则基于两个参数弹性的方法将比基于多参数弹性的方法更适用,因为简单的模型为建模径流的整体变化提供了更高的置信度。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号