...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series
【24h】

Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series

机译:MK检验和EMD方法在水文时间序列趋势识别中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann-Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend's magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends' magnitude and series' length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series' trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends' magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.
机译:趋势识别是水文时间序列分析中的重要问题,但由于方法的多样性,它也是一项艰巨的任务。本文主要研究了Mann-Kendall(MK)检验和经验模式分解(EMD)方法之间的趋势识别趋势。综合和观察到的序列分析表明,EMD与其他方法相比具有更好的性能。结果表明,使用MK测试时,预增白不能真正改善趋势识别,但有时会导致错误的结果。这可能是由于趋势之间的良好相关性,因此预先进行白化会削弱趋势的幅度。如果所分析序列的趋势幅度较小,则无法通过MK检验准确识别,因为该趋势会被序列的其他组件严重淹没,从而无法准确识别趋势。当分析的序列长度较短时,其趋势无法通过MK测试准确识别。但是,EMD方法可以消除趋势量值和序列长度的影响,因此具有更有效的趋势识别能力。因此,建议可以通过MK测试直接识别系列的趋势,而无需进行预白化;此外,在确定趋势时应仔细考虑趋势量的影响。相比之下,EMD方法可以通过考虑统计意义来自适应地确定序列的非线性和非平稳趋势的特定形状,因此它可以作为水文时间序列趋势识别的有效替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号