...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >The relevance of in-situ and laboratory characterization of sandy soil hydraulic properties for soil water simulations
【24h】

The relevance of in-situ and laboratory characterization of sandy soil hydraulic properties for soil water simulations

机译:沙质土壤水力学特性的原位和实验室表征与土壤水分模拟的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Field water flow processes can be precisely delineated with proper sets of soil hydraulic properties derived from in situ and/or laboratory experiments. In this study we analyzed and compared soil hydraulic properties obtained by traditional laboratory experiments and inverse optimization tension infiltrometer data along the vertical direction within two typical Podzol profiles with sand texture in a potato field. The main goal was to identify proper sets of hydraulic parameters and to evaluate their relevance on hydrological model performance for irrigation management purposes. Tension disc infiltration experiments were carried out at four and five different depths for both profiles at consecutive negative pressure heads of 12, 6, 3 and 0.1 cm. At the same locations and depths undisturbed samples were taken to determine Mualem-van Genuchten (MVG) hydraulic parameters (theta(r), residual water content, theta(s), saturated water content, alpha and n, shape parameters and K-ls, saturated hydraulic conductivity) in the laboratory. Results demonstrated horizontal differences and vertical variability of hydraulic properties. The tension disc infiltration data fitted well in inverse modeling using Hydrus 2D/3D in combination with final water content at the end of the experiment, theta(f). Four MVG parameters (theta(s), alpha, n and field saturated hydraulic conductivity K-fs) were estimated (theta(r) set to zero), with estimated K-ls and alpha values being relatively similar to values from Wooding's solution which used as initial value and estimated theta(s) corresponded to (effective) field saturated water content, theta(f). The laboratory measurement of K-ls yielded 2-30 times higher values than the field method K-fs from top to subsoil layers, while there was a significant correlation between both K-s values (r = 0.75). We found significant differences of MVG parameters theta(s), n and alpha values between laboratory and field measurements, but again a significant correlation was observed between laboratory and field MVG parameters namely K-s, n, theta(s) (r >= 0.59). Assessment of the parameter relevance in 1-D model simulations, illustrated that the model over predicted and under predicted top soil-water content using laboratory and field experiments data sets respectively. The field MVG parameter data set resulted in better agreement to observed soil-water content as compared to the laboratory data set at nodes 10 and 20 cm. However, better simulation results were achieved using the laboratory data set at 30-60 cm depths. Results of our study do not confirm whether laboratory or field experiments data sets are most appropriate to predict soil water fluctuations in a complete soil profile, while field experiments are preferred in many studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:现场水流过程可以用从现场和/或实验室实验中得出的适当的土壤水力学特性精确地描述。在这项研究中,我们分析和比较了传统的实验室实验获得的土壤水力特性,以及在马铃薯田中两个典型的Podzol剖面内沿垂直方向的逆优化张力渗透仪数据的垂直方向。主要目标是确定适当的水力参数集,并评估它们与水文模型性能的相关性,以进行灌溉管理。在连续的负压头分别为12、6、3和0.1 cm的两个剖面上,在四个和五个不同的深度进行了张力盘渗透实验。在相同的位置和深度,不受干扰地采集样品以确定Mualem-van Genuchten(MVG)的水力参数(θ,残余水含量,θ,饱和水含量,α和n,形状参数和K-ls ,饱和导水率)。结果证明了水力特性的水平差异和垂直变化。在实验结束时,使用Hydrus 2D / 3D结合最终水含量theta(f),逆向模型中的张力盘渗透数据非常适合。估计了四个MVG参数(θ,α,n和场饱和水力传导率K-fs)(θ(r)设置为零),估计的K-ls和alpha值与Wooding解的值相对相似,其中用作初始值,估计的theta(s)对应于(有效)场饱和水含量theta(f)。实验室测量的K-ls的值比田间方法K-fs从表层到下层土壤的值高出2-30倍,而两个K-s值之间存在显着相关性(r = 0.75)。我们发现实验室和现场测量之间的MVG参数theta(s),n和alpha值存在显着差异,但再次观察到实验室和现场MVG参数即Ks,n,theta(s)之间存在显着相关性(r> = 0.59) 。一维模型模拟中参数相关性的评估表明,分别使用实验室和现场实验数据集,该模型在预测的最高土壤水分含量和预测的最高土壤水分含量之下。与节点10和20 cm处的实验室数据集相比,现场MVG参数数据集与观察到的土壤含水量具有更好的一致性。但是,使用30-60 cm深度的实验室数据集可获得更好的模拟结果。我们的研究结果无法确定实验室或野外实验数据集是否最适合预测完整土壤剖面中的土壤水分波动,而在许多研究中则首选野外实验。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号