首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health politics, policy and law >Who deserves health care? The effects of causal attributions and group cues on public attitudes about responsibility for health care costs.
【24h】

Who deserves health care? The effects of causal attributions and group cues on public attitudes about responsibility for health care costs.

机译:谁值得医疗?因果归因和群体线索对公众对医疗保健费用责任的态度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research investigates the impact of cues about ascriptive group characteristics (race, class, gender) and the causes of ill health (health behaviors, inborn biological traits, social systemic factors) on beliefs about who deserves society's help in paying for the costs of medical treatment. Drawing on data from three original vignette experiments embedded in a nationally representative survey of American adults, we find that respondents are reluctant to blame or deny societal support in response to explicit cues about racial attributes--but equally explicit cues about the causal impact of individual behaviors on health have large effects on expressed attitudes. Across all three experiments, a focus on individual behavioral causes of illness is associated with increased support for individual responsibility for health care costs and lower support for government-financed health insurance. Beliefs about social groups and causal attributions are, however, tightly intertwined. We find that when groups suffering ill health are defined in racial, class, or gender terms, Americans differ in their attribution of health disparities to individual behaviors versus biological or systemic factors. Because causal attributions also affect health policy opinions, varying patterns of causal attribution may reinforce group stereotypes and undermine support for universal access to health care.
机译:这项研究调查了关于特征性群体特征(种族,阶级,性别)的线索以及健康状况不良的原因(健康行为,先天生物学特征,社会系统性因素)对以下信念的影响:谁应该得到社会的帮助来支付医疗费用治疗。利用来自美国成年人代表性的全国性代表性调查中的三个原始小插图实验的数据,我们发现受访者不愿责备或否认社会支持,以回应关于种族属性的明确暗示,但同样也涉及有关个人因果影响的明确暗示健康行为对表达的态度有很大影响。在所有三个实验中,对个人行为原因的关注与对个人医疗保健费用责任的支持增加以及对政府资助的健康保险的支持减少有关。然而,关于社会群体和因果归因的信念却紧密地交织在一起。我们发现,当以种族,阶级或性别来定义遭受健康不良的群体时,美国人将健康差异归因于个人行为与生物学或系统性因素的区别。由于因果归因还会影响卫生政策意见,因此因果归因的不同模式可能会增强群体的刻板印象,并破坏对普遍获得医疗服务的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号