...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Infection >A prospective study of the diagnostic utility of sputum Gram stain in pneumonia.
【24h】

A prospective study of the diagnostic utility of sputum Gram stain in pneumonia.

机译:痰革兰氏染色对肺炎的诊断作用的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Sputum Gram stain and culture have been said to be unreliable indicators of the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. The etiological diagnosis of pneumonia is surrounded by great degree of uncertainty. This uncertainty should be and can be calculated and incorporated in the diagnosis and treatment. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic value of sputum Gram stain in etiological diagnosis and initial selection of antimicrobial therapy of bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN-METHOD: Prospective study of 1390 patients with CAP admitted January 2002-June 2008, to our institutions. Of the 1390 patients, 178 (12.8%) fulfilled the criteria for inclusion into this study (good-quality sputa and presence of the same microorganism in blood and sputum cultures which was used as gold standard for assessing the diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic value of sputum Gram stain). RESULTS: The sensitivity of sputum Gram stain was 0.82 for Pneumococcal pneumonia, 0.76 for Staphylococcal pneumonia, 0.79 for Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia and 0.78 for Gram-negative bacilli pneumonia. The specificity of sputum Gram stain was 0.93 for Pneumococcal pneumonia, 0.96 for Staphylococcal pneumonia, 0.96 for H. influenzae pneumonia and 0.95 for Gram-negative bacilli pneumonia. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 11.58 for Pneumococcal pneumonia, 19.38 for Staphylococcal pneumonia, 16.84 for H. influenzae pneumonia, 14.26 for Gram-negative bacilli pneumonia. The negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.20 for Pneumococcal pneumonia, 0.25 for Staphylococcal pneumonia, 0.22 for H. influenzae pneumonia, and 0.23 for Gram-negative bacilli pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Sputum Gram stain is a dependable diagnostic test for the early etiological diagnosis of bacterial CAP that helps in choosing orthological and appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy.
机译:引言:痰革兰氏染色和培养被认为是细菌性肺炎的微生物学诊断的不可靠指标。肺炎的病因诊断周围充满高度不确定性。应该并且可以计算出这种不确定性,并将其纳入诊断和治疗。研究目的:确定痰革兰氏染色在细菌性社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病因学诊断和抗菌治疗的初步选择中的诊断准确性和诊断价值。设计方法:对2002年1月至2008年6月入院的1390例CAP患者进行了前瞻性研究。在1390名患者中,有178名(12.8%)符合纳入本研究的标准(优质痰液以及血液和痰培养物中存在相同的微生物,这被用作评估痰液的诊断准确性和诊断价值的金标准。革兰氏染色)。结果:痰革兰氏染色对肺炎球菌肺炎的敏感性为0.82,对葡萄球菌性肺炎的敏感性为0.76,对流感嗜血杆菌性肺炎的敏感性为0.79,对革兰氏阴性杆菌性肺炎的敏感性为0.78。痰革兰氏染色的特异性为肺炎球菌性肺炎为0.93,葡萄球菌性肺炎为0.96,流感嗜血杆菌性肺炎为0.96,革兰氏阴性杆菌性肺炎为0.95。肺炎球菌性肺炎的正似然比(LR +)为11.58,葡萄球菌性肺炎为19.38,流感嗜血杆菌性肺炎为16.84,革兰氏阴性杆菌性肺炎为14.26。肺炎球菌性肺炎的阴性似然比(LR-)为0.20,葡萄球菌性肺炎为0.25,流感嗜血杆菌性肺炎为0.22,革兰氏阴性杆菌性肺炎为0.23。结论:痰革兰氏染色是对细菌性CAP的早期病因学诊断的可靠诊断测试,有助于选择矫正和适当的初始抗菌治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号