...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Medicine >Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.
【24h】

Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.

机译:通过提供目标护理包,降低高危老年医学患者出院后30天的医院再入院或急诊科(ED)的就诊率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RATIONALE: Care coordination has shown inconsistent results as a mechanism to reduce hospital readmission and postdischarge emergency department (ED) visit rates. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a supplemental care bundle targeting high-risk elderly inpatients implemented by hospital-based staff compared to usual care on a composite outcome of hospital readmission and/or ED visitation at 30 and 60 days following discharge. PATIENTS/METHODS: Randomized controlled pilot study in 41 medical inpatients predisposed to unplanned readmission or postdischarge ED visitation, conducted at Baylor University Medical Center. The intervention group care bundle consisted of medication counseling/reconciliation by a clinical pharmacist (CP), condition specific education/enhanced discharge planning by a care coordinator (CC), and phone follow-up. RESULTS: Groups had similar baseline characteristics. Intervention group readmission/ED visit rates were reduced at 30 days compared to the control group (10.0% versus 38.1%, P = 0.04), but not at 60 days (30.0% versus 42.9%, P = 0.52). For those patients who had a readmission/postdischarge ED visit, the time interval to this event was longer in the intervention group compared to usual care (36.2 versus 15.7 days, P = 0.05). Study power was insufficient to reliably compare the effects of the intervention on lengths of index hospital stay between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted care bundle delivered to high-risk elderly inpatients decreased unplanned acute health care utilization up to 30 days following discharge. Dissipation of this effect by 60 days postdischarge defines reasonable expectations for analogous hospital-based educational interventions. Further research is needed regarding the impacts of similar care bundles in larger populations across a variety of inpatient settings.
机译:理由:护理协调显示出不一致的结果,这是降低医院再入院率和出院后急诊科(ED)出诊率的机制。目的:评估针对住院患者的高风险老年患者的补充护理捆绑与普通护理相比,对出院后30天和60天住院再入院和/或急诊就诊的综合结果的影响。患者/方法:在Baylor大学医学中心进行的41名有计划外再入院或出院后急诊就诊的住院患者的随机对照试验研究。干预组护理服务包括临床药剂师(CP)进行的药物咨询/和解,护理协调员(CC)进行的针对特定病情的教育/出院计划以及电话随访。结果:各组具有相似的基线特征。与对照组相比,干预组的再入院/ ED就诊率在30天时降低了(10.0%对38.1%,P = 0.04),但在60天时没有降低(30.0%对42.9%,P = 0.52)。对于那些有再入院/出院后ED访视的患者,与常规护理相比,干预组中此事件的时间间隔更长(36.2对15.7天,P = 0.05)。研究能力不足以可靠地比较干预措施对两组间住院时间的影响。结论:向高危老年住院患者提供的定向护理包可减少出院后30天的计划外急性医疗利用率。出院后60天消除这种影响,定义了对基于医院的类似教育干预措施的合理期望。关于在各种住院环境中类似护理包对更大人群的影响,还需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号