...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Medicine >Changes in hospitals' credentialing requirements for board certification from 2005 to 2010
【24h】

Changes in hospitals' credentialing requirements for board certification from 2005 to 2010

机译:从2005年到2010年医院对董事会认证的资格要求的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In 2005, we conducted a study of the prevalence of board certification requirements for hospital privileging and found that one-third of hospitals did not require pediatricians to be board certified. In 2010, the American Board of Pediatrics implemented the Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. To examine changes in the policies of hospitals regarding requirements for board certification, we surveyed privileging personnel at hospitals across the country. STUDY DESIGN: Telephone survey between April 2010 and June 2010 of privileging personnel at a random sample of 220 hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 220 hospitals, 23 were ineligible because they had no pediatricians on staff, and 26 hospitals refused to participate. The remaining 154 hospitals completed the survey, resulting in a 78% participation rate. Compared with our findings in 2005, in 2010 a greater proportion of hospitals now require board certification for general pediatricians (80% vs 67%, P=0.141) and pediatric subspecialists (86% vs 71%, P=0.048). Among these hospitals, a larger proportion (24% vs 4%) now requires board certification for all pediatricians at the point of initial privileging. However, a greater proportion of hospitals reported that they make exceptions to their board certification policies (99% vs 41%). CONCLUSION: In the 5 years since our previous study, a larger proportion of hospitals now require pediatricians to be board certified, although the proportion of hospitals that make exceptions to this policy has increased twofold. Hospitals appear to be incorporating the MOC program into their privileging policies.
机译:目的:2005年,我们对医院特权的董事会认证要求的普遍性进行了研究,发现三分之一的医院不需要儿科医生获得董事会认证。 2010年,美国儿科学会实施了认证维持(MOC)计划。为了检查有关董事会认证要求的医院政策的变化,我们对全国各地医院的特权人员进行了调查。研究设计:在2010年4月至2010年6月之间对220名医院中的特权人员进行电话调查。结果:在220家医院中,有23家不符合资格,因为他们没有小儿科医师,还有26家医院拒绝参加。其余154家医院完成了调查,参与率为78%。与我们在2005年的调查结果相比,2010年,现在有更多比例的医院要求普通儿科医生(80%比67%,P = 0.141)和儿科专科医生(86%比71%,P = 0.048)进行董事会认证。在这些医院中,现在有更大比例的医院(24%对4%)要求在初次获得特权时对所有儿科医生进行董事会认证。但是,更大比例的医院报告说他们对董事会认证政策有所例外(99%比41%)。结论:自我们之前的研究以来的5年中,尽管有例外情况的医院比例增加了两倍,但现在有较大比例的医院要求儿科医生获得董事会认证。医院似乎正在将MOC计划纳入其特权政策中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号