首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences >A comparison of cloud and boundary layer variables in the ECMWF forecast model with observations at Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) ice camp
【24h】

A comparison of cloud and boundary layer variables in the ECMWF forecast model with observations at Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) ice camp

机译:ECMWF预测模型中的云层和边界层变量与北冰洋地表热收支(SHEBA)冰场观测值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cloud and boundary layer variables from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) forecast model were compared with measurements made from surface instruments and from upward looking 8 mm wavelength radar and lidar at the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) ice camp during November and December of 1997. The precipitation accumulation, near-surface winds, and surface downward longwave irradiance predicted by the model were in good agreement with SHEBA observations during this period. However, surface downward longwave irradiance was underestimated by 10 W m(-2) on average when low clouds were present in the model and observations. The model demonstrated considerable skill in predicting the occurrence and vertical extent of cloudiness over SHEBA, with some tendency to overestimate the frequency of clouds below 1 km. A synthetic radar reflectivity estimated from the ECMWF model variables was compared with 8 mm wavelength radar measurements. The two were broadly consistent only if the assumed snowflake size distribution over SHEBA had a smaller proportion of large flakes than was found in previous studies at lower latitudes. The ECMWF model assumes a temperature-dependent partitioning of cloud condensate between water and ice. Lidar depolarization measurements at SHEBA indicate that both liquid and ice phase clouds occurred over a wide range of temperatures throughout the winter season, with liquid occurring at temperatures as low as 239 K. A much larger fraction of liquid water clouds was observed than the ECMWF model predicted. The largest discrepancies between the ECMWF model and the observations were in surface temperature (up to 15 K) and turbulent sensible heat fluxes (up to 60 W m(-2)). These appear to be due at least partially to the ECMWF sea ice model, which did not allow surface temperatures to respond nearly as rapidly to changing atmospheric conditions as was observed. [References: 20]
机译:欧洲中距离天气预报中心(ECMWF)预报模型的云层和边界层变量与北冰洋地表热收支(SHEBA)的地面仪器以及向上看的8毫米波长雷达和激光雷达的测量结果进行了比较1997年11月和12月的冰场。该模型预测的降水积累,近地表风和地面向下的长波辐照度与该期间的SHEBA观测值非常吻合。但是,当模型和观测结果中出现低云时,地面向下的长波辐照度平均低估了10 W m(-2)。该模型在预测SHEBA上的阴天的发生和垂直范围方面显示出相当高的技巧,并且有一些趋势高估了1 km以下的云的频率。根据ECMWF模型变量估计的合成雷达反射率与8毫米波长雷达测量值进行了比较。仅当假定在SHEBA上的雪花尺寸分布比以前在较低纬度的研究中发现的大片状比例要小时,两者才基本一致。 ECMWF模型假定水和冰之间的云凝结水温度依温度分配。在SHEBA进行的激光雷达去极化测量表明,整个冬季温度范围内都发生了液相和冰相云,并且液流的温度低至239K。与ECMWF模型相比,观察到的液态水云比例要大得多。预料到的。 ECMWF模型与观测值之间最大的差异在于表面温度(最高15 K)和湍流显热通量(最高60 W m(-2))。这些似乎至少部分是由于ECMWF海冰模型造成的,该模型没有像观察到的那样允许地表温度对变化的大气条件几乎一样迅速地做出响应。 [参考:20]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号