...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences >Stormtime ring-current formation: A comparison between single-and double-dip model storms with similar transport characteristics
【24h】

Stormtime ring-current formation: A comparison between single-and double-dip model storms with similar transport characteristics

机译:风暴时间环流形成:具有相似传输特性的单倾和双倾模型风暴的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intense magnetic storms often develop in two stages such that a second ring current enhancement begins before the first ring current enhancement has recovered to the prestorm level. Since Dst traces of such storms exhibit two dips, we refer to these as double-dip storms. Here we compare double- and single-dip storms with similar convective and diffusive transport characteristics for effectiveness at forming the proton ring current. Our model storms consist of superposition of almost randomly occurring impulses in the convection electric field. We have synthesized a hypothetical double-dip storm consisting of a moderate 6-hour storm, followed by a 3-hour quiet interval and then by a more intense 15-hour storm, for a total duration of 24 hours. For comparison, we consider a single-dip model storm with an unmodulated 24-hour main phase during which the root-mean-square enhancement of the cross-tail potential drop is made equal to the time-weighted rms enhancement for the double-dip model storm. This leads to comparable time-averaged diffusion coefficients for our single- and double-dip model storms. The mean enhancement of the cross-tail potential drop of the two storms are also comparable. When the stormtime proton plasma sheet distribution, the source of ring current protons, is left unchanged from its quiet (prestorm) level, we find little difference in proton energy content per unit R (which is geocentric distance normalized by R-E) between our double- and single-dip model storms. The proton-energy content of the magnetosphere is roughly increased by a factor of 2.5 by either model storm under this scenario, in which the overall amount of stormtime transport, whether convective or diffusive, is nearly the same for the double- and single-dip model storms. As in our earlier work, we require here an enhanced stormtime plasma sheet population (in addition to enhanced particle transport) in order to achieve (for example) the 20-fold increase in /Dst/ characteristic of a large storm. Only when we invoke a two-stage stormtime enhancement of the boundary (plasma sheet) phase space density in combination with the two-stage enhancement in particle transport, our double-dip model storm does show a much larger total energy content than our single-dip model storm with a one-stage enhancement of the boundary spectrum. This suggests that plasma sheet preconditioning may be important for the development of especially intense storms. [References: 40]
机译:强烈的电磁风暴通常分两个阶段发展,使得第二环电流增强在第一环电流增强恢复到风暴前水平之前就开始了。由于此类风暴的Dst迹线出现两次倾角,因此我们将其称为双倾角风暴。在这里,我们比较具有相似对流和扩散输运特性的两次和一次浸入风暴,以有效地形成质子环流。我们的模型风暴包括对流电场中几乎随机发生的脉冲的叠加。我们合成了一个假想的双倾角风暴,包括一个中等的6小时暴风雨,然后是3小时的安静间隔,然后是一个更强烈的15小时暴风雨,总共持续24小时。为了进行比较,我们考虑了具有非调制的24小时主相位的单倾模型风暴,在此期间,使横尾电位降的均方根增强等于两次浸入的时间加权均方根增强模型风暴。这为我们的单和双浸模型风暴提供了可比的时间平均扩散系数。两次风暴的尾巴电位下降的平均增强值也是可比的。当风暴时质子等离子体薄分布(环流质子的来源)与其安静(暴雨前)水平保持不变时,我们发现,双倍能量之间的每单位R的质子能量含量(以RE归一化的地心距离)几乎没有差异。和一次浸入式模型风暴。在这种情况下,无论哪种模式风暴,磁层的质子能量含量都将增加约2.5倍,其中,对流和扩散的风暴时间传输总量几乎相同,无论是对流还是扩散模型风暴。与我们早期的工作一样,这里我们需要增加风暴时间的血浆片数(除了增加粒子传输之外),以实现(例如)大风暴的/ Dst /特性增加20倍。只有当我们调用边界(等离子片)相空间密度的两阶段风暴时间增强与粒子传输的两阶段增强相结合时,我们的双浸模型风暴确实显示出比单粒子模型大得多的总能量含量。边界谱的一级增强的倾角模型风暴。这表明等离子片预处理对于发生特别强的风暴可能很重要。 [参考:40]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号