首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hepatology: The Journal of the European Association for the Study of the Liver >Role of the EASL, RECIST, and WHO response guidelines alone or in combination for hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
【24h】

Role of the EASL, RECIST, and WHO response guidelines alone or in combination for hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

机译:单独或结合使用EASL,RECIST和WHO反应指南对肝细胞癌的作用:放射-病理学相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We sought to study receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for assessing response following locoregional therapies individually and in various combinations. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent liver explantation following locoregional therapies. Response was assessed using EASL, RECIST, and WHO. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-method agreement. Uni/multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the variables predicting complete pathologic necrosis. Numerical values were assigned to the response classes: complete response=0, partial response=1, stable disease=2, and progressive disease=3. Various mathematical combinations of EASL and WHO were tested to calculate scores and their ROCs were studied using pathological examination of the explant as the gold standard. RESULTS: Median times (95% CI) to the WHO, RECIST, and EASL responses were 5.3 (4-11.5), 5.6 (4-11.5), and 1.3months (1.2-1.5), respectively. Kappa coefficients for WHO/RECIST, WHO/EASL, and RECIST/EASL were 0.78, 0.28, and 0.31, respectively. EASL response demonstrated significant odds ratios for predicting complete pathologic necrosis on uni/multivariate analyses. Calculated areas under the ROC curves were: RECIST: 0.63, WHO: 0.68, EASL: 0.82, EASL+WHO: 0.82, EASLxWHO: 0.85, EASL+(2xWHO): 0.79 and (2xEASL)+WHO: 0.85. An EASLxWHO Score of 1 had 90.2% sensitivity for predicting complete pathologic necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The product of WHO and EASL demonstrated better ROC than the individual guidelines for assessment of tumor response. EASLxWHO scoring system provides a simple and clinically applicable method of response assessment following locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.
机译:背景与目的:我们试图研究欧洲肝病研究协会(EASL)的受试者工作特征(ROC),实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)和世界卫生组织(WHO)评估反应的指南局部治疗和单独治疗方法:八十一例肝细胞癌患者在局部治疗后接受了肝移植术。使用EASL,RECIST和WHO评估反应。使用Kappa统计信息确定方法间的一致性。进行单因素/多元逻辑回归分析以确定预测完全病理性坏死的变量。将数值分配给反应类别:完全反应= 0,部分反应= 1,稳定疾病= 2和进行性疾病= 3。测试了EASL和WHO的各种数学组合以计算分数,并使用外植体的病理学检查作为金标准研究了其ROC。结果:WHO,RECIST和EASL响应的中位时间(95%CI)分别为5.3(4-11.5),5.6(4-11.5)和1.3个月(1.2-1.5)。 WHO / RECIST,WHO / EASL和RECIST / EASL的Kappa系数分别为0.78、0.28和0.31。 EASL反应在单因素/多因素分析中显示出预测完全病理性坏死的优势比。 ROC曲线下的计算面积为:RECIST:0.63,WHO:0.68,EASL:0.82,EASL + WHO:0.82,EASLxWHO:0.85,EASL +(2xWHO):0.79和(2xEASL)+ WHO:0.85。 EASLxWHO得分1对预测完全病理坏死有90.2%的敏感性。结论:WHO和EASL产品证明ROC比评估肿瘤反应的个别指南更好。 EASLxWHO评分系统为肝细胞癌局部治疗后的反应评估提供了一种简单且可临床应用的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号