...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hepatology: The Journal of the European Association for the Study of the Liver >Using non-invasive biomarkers to identify hepatic fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Edinburgh type 2 diabetes study
【24h】

Using non-invasive biomarkers to identify hepatic fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Edinburgh type 2 diabetes study

机译:使用非侵入性生物标记物识别2型糖尿病患者的肝纤维化:爱丁堡2型糖尿病研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background & Aims It is difficult to determine the different stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without the use of invasive liver biopsy. In this study we investigated five non-invasive biomarkers used previously to detect hepatic fibrosis and determined the level of agreement between them in order to inform future research. Methods In the Edinburgh Type 2 Diabetes Study, a population-based cohort aged 60-74 years with type 2 diabetes, 831 participants underwent ultrasound assessment for fatty liver and had serum aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT), aspartate to platelet ratio index (APRI), European Liver Fibrosis panel (ELF), Fibrosis-4 Score (FIB4) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) measured. Results Literature based cut-offs yielded marked differences in the proportions of the cohort with probable liver fibrosis in the full cohort. Agreement between the top 5% of the distribution for each biomarker pair was poor. APRI and FIB4 had the best positive agreement at 76.4%, but agreement for all of the other serum biomarker pairs was between 18% and 34%. Agreement with LSM was poor (9-16%). Conclusions We found poor correlation between the five biomarkers of liver fibrosis studied. Using the top 5% of each biomarker resulted in good agreement on the absence of advanced liver disease but poor agreement on the presence of advanced disease. Further work is required to validate these markers against liver biopsy and to determine their predictive value for clinical liver-related endpoints, in a range of different low and high risk population groups.
机译:背景与目的如果不使用侵入性肝活检,很难确定非酒精性脂肪肝疾病的不同阶段。在这项研究中,我们调查了五个以前用于检测肝纤维化的非侵入性生物标记物,并确定了它们之间的一致性水平,以便为将来的研究提供参考。方法在爱丁堡2型糖尿病研究中,年龄为60-74岁的2型糖尿病人群,对831名参与者进行了脂肪肝超声检查,并具有血清天冬氨酸转氨酶与丙氨酸转氨酶比(AST / ALT),天冬氨酸至血小板比率指数(APRI),欧洲肝纤维化专家组(ELF),纤维化4评分(FIB4)和肝硬度测量(LSM)。结果基于文献的临界值在整个队列中有肝纤维化可能的队列比例上存在显着差异。每个生物标记对的前5%分布之间的一致性差。 APRI和FIB4的阳性一致性最佳,为76.4%,但所有其他血清生物标志物对的一致性在18%至34%之间。与LSM的协议很差(9-16%)。结论我们发现所研究的肝纤维化的五个生物标志物之间的相关性较差。使用每种生物标志物的前5%,在没有晚期肝病的情况下达成良好共识,而在存在晚期肝病的问题上达成较差共识。需要进一步的工作来验证这些针对肝活检的标志物,并确定其在一系列不同的低风险和高风险人群中对临床肝相关终点的预测价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号