...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Crucial importance of using a sliding calliper to measure distance for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment
【24h】

Crucial importance of using a sliding calliper to measure distance for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment

机译:使用滑动卡尺测量距离以进行颈股脉搏波速度评估至关重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the past, different methods have been used to measure the carotid-femoral distance for the assessment of pulse wave velocity (PWV). However, the latest consensus published advises to use 80% of the direct straight carotid-femoral distance (D0.8) using either a flexible tape or a sliding calliper. We studied the influence of the use of a tape measure and a calliper on PWV values and provided equations to derive the straight D0.8 distance from previous methodologies. METHODS: PWV was measured in patients referred for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Carotid-femoral, carotid-sternal notch, and sternal notch-femoral distances were measured with a tape and a sliding calliper. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients (141 men and 118 women) were recruited consecutively. Their BMI ranged from 18 to 45 kg/m (28.4 ± 5.0, mean ± SD). As expected, distances measured with tape were longer (3.1 ± 1.3 cm for D0.8) leading to higher values of PWV (0.6 ± 0.3 m/s for PWV0.8). This difference was similar in men and women and depended for 20% on the BMI. Equations explaining more than 85% of variance can be used to convert tape carotid-femoral, carotid-sternal notch, and tape sternal notch-femoral distances to D0.8. CONCLUSION: It is crucial to use a sliding calliper to assess distances for PWV measurement. The overestimation with flexible tape depends on the BMI but not on the sex. Conversion equations between previous methods and the D0.8 method can be used.
机译:背景与目的:过去,已采用不同的方法来测量颈股距,以评估脉搏波速度(PWV)。但是,最新发布的共识建议使用软性胶带或滑动卡尺使用颈动脉直接股骨直接距离(D0.8)的80%。我们研究了使用卷尺和游标卡尺对PWV值的影响,并提供了从先前方法中得出直线D0.8距离的方程式。方法:对需要进行动态血压监测的患者进行PWV测量。用胶带和游标卡尺测量颈-股骨,颈-胸骨切迹和胸骨-股骨的距离。结果:连续招募了259例患者(141名男性和118名女性)。他们的BMI范围从18到45 kg / m 28.4±5.0,平均值±SD。正如预期的那样,用胶带测量的距离更长(D0.8为3.1±1.3厘米),从而导致PWV值更高(PWV0.8为0.6±0.3 m / s)。男女之间的差异相似,并且依赖于BMI的20%。可以使用解释方差超过85%的方程式将胶带的颈动脉-股骨,颈动脉-胸骨切开和磁带胸骨-股骨切开距离转换为D0.8。结论:使用滑动卡尺评估PWV测量距离至关重要。弹性带的高估取决于BMI,而不取决于性别。可以使用先前方法和D0.8方法之间的转换方程式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号