...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Qigong for hypertension: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
【24h】

Qigong for hypertension: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

机译:气功治疗高血压:对随机临床试验的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess systematically the clinical evidence of qigong for hypertension. METHODS: Databases were searched up to August 2006. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing qigong in patients with hypertension of any origin and assessing clinically relevant outcomes were considered. Trials using any type of control intervention were included. The selection of studies, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by at least two reviewers. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad score. RESULTS: A total of 121 potentially relevant articles were identified and 12 RCTs were included. Seven RCTs tested qigong in combination with antihypertensive drugs compared with antihypertensive drugs alone. The meta-analysis of two trials reporting adequate data suggested beneficial effects in favour of qigong [weighted mean difference, systolic blood pressure (SBP) -12.1 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -17.1 to -7.0; diastolic blood pressure -8.5 mmHg, 95% CI -12.6 to -4.4]. Qigong was compared with waiting list control in two RCTs and was found to reduce SBP significantly (weighted mean difference -18.5 mmHg, 95% CI -23.1 to -13.9). In three further RCTs the comparisons made were: qigong combined with conventional therapy versus muscle relaxation combined with conventional therapy; qigong as a sole treatment versus exercise. All reported positive results in at least some of the relevant outcome measures. The methodological quality of the studies was low. CONCLUSION: There is some encouraging evidence of qigong for lowering SBP, but the conclusiveness of these findings is limited. Rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm these results.
机译:目的:系统评价气功治疗高血压的临床证据。方法:检索到2006年8月的数据库。考虑所有对任何来源的高血压患者进行气功测试并评估临床相关结果的随机临床试验(RCT)。包括使用任何类型的控制干预的试验。研究的选择,数据提取和质量评估由至少两名审阅者独立进行。使用Jadad评分评估方法学质量。结果:共鉴定了121篇潜在相关文章,并纳入了12篇RCT。与单独使用降压药相比,七项RCT测试了气功与降压药的组合。对两项报道充分数据的试验的荟萃分析表明,有利于气功的有益效果[加权平均差异,收缩压(SBP)-12.1 mmHg,95%置信区间(CI)-17.1至-7.0;舒张压-8.5 mmHg,95%CI -12.6至-4.4]。在两个随机对照试验中,将气功与等候名单对照进行了比较,发现气功可以显着降低SBP(加权平均差异-18.5 mmHg,95%CI -23.1至-13.9)。在另外三个RCT中,进行了比较:气功联合常规疗法与肌肉松弛联合常规疗法;气功是唯一的运动还是运动。在至少一些相关的结果指标中,所有报告的都是积极结果。研究的方法学质量很低。结论:有一些令人鼓舞的证据表明,气功可以降低SBP,但是这些发现的结论性有限。严格设计的试验才能保证这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号