首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >The lower the better: does simplicity lead to absurdity?
【24h】

The lower the better: does simplicity lead to absurdity?

机译:越低越好:简单会导致荒谬吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the growing availability of results from large clinical trials, the effectiveness of cardiovascular prevention strategies is becoming better defined and the strategies are being used more widely. However, when the effect of a treatment strategy has been demonstrated, such as lowering blood pressure with antihypertensive drugs, many questions remain unanswered. What is the best blood pressure target to aim for? What is the best specific treatment? What is the impact of the treatment for individuals and different populations? Health policy decision-makers need answers to these questions to improve the health system and make it more cost efficient. One approach aiming to answer these questions is to model the impact of a treatment strategy for a specific national population. Such modelling requires a certain amount of information: (i) a reliable measure of the treatment effect of the strategy from randomised, controlled clinical trials and (ii) an accurate description of the target population, including all characteristics that are relevant for the impact prediction. In the case of the impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs, the relevant characteristics are the joint distributions of risk factors of cardiovascular events, including, amongst others, blood pressure, the structure of the cardiovascular risk in the target population, and the link between that risk structure and the joint distributions of risk factors.These elements are only partially known in a given national population. Transversal cohort studies ideally inform on the joint distributions of risk factors within the cohorts. Longitudinal studies of these cohorts inform on the link between the joint distributions of risk factors and the incidence of cardiovascular events, fatal or not: the most typical example is the Framingham study . These prospective studies can be analysed together at the individual level, which increases the power of theanalyses (e.g. allowing specific exploration in important strata such as by age and sex) . Death statistics comprise core information that is most frequently available at the nation level, and can be used to extrapolate other information sources at that level .
机译:随着大型临床试验结果的日益普及,心血管疾病预防策略的有效性变得越来越明确,并且这些策略也得到了更广泛的使用。但是,当已经证明了一种治疗策略的效果时,例如使用降压药降低血压,许多问题仍然没有答案。最佳血压目标是什么?最好的具体治疗方法是什么?这种治疗对个人和不同人群有什么影响?卫生政策决策者需要回答这些问题,以改善卫生系统并使其更具成本效益。旨在回答这些问题的一种方法是模拟治疗策略对特定国民的影响。这种建模需要一定量的信息:(i)通过随机对照临床试验可靠地衡量该策略的治疗效果,以及(ii)对目标人群的准确描述,包括与影响预测有关的所有特征。就降血压药物的影响而言,相关特征是心血管事件危险因素的联合分布,其中包括血压,目标人群中心血管疾病风险的结构以及两者之间的联系。这些因素在给定的全国人口中仅被部分了解。理想情况下,横向队列研究可以揭示队列中危险因素的联合分布。这些队列的纵向研究揭示了危险因素的关节分布与心血管事件发生与否之间的联系,无论是否致命:最典型的例子是弗雷明汉研究。这些前瞻性研究可以在个体水平上一起进行分析,从而增加了分析的能力(例如,允许按年龄和性别对重要阶层进行特定的探索)。死亡统计数据包括国家一级最常提供的核心信息,并可用于推断该级别上的其他信息来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号