...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Insufficient evidence to conclude whether or not Transcendental Meditation decreases blood pressure: results of a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
【24h】

Insufficient evidence to conclude whether or not Transcendental Meditation decreases blood pressure: results of a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

机译:没有足够的证据来推断先验冥想是否会降低血压:随机临床试验的系统评价结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To carry out an independent, systematic review of randomized clinical trials of Transcendental Meditation (TM) for cumulative effects on blood pressure. METHOD: Searches were made of electronic databases and the collected papers and official web sites of the TM organization. We included only randomized clinical trials, without confounding co-interventions, which measured the cumulative effects of TM on blood pressure. RESULTS: Six trials met the inclusion criteria but one, reported only in abstract form, could not be evaluated. Procedures for establishing baseline blood pressure were adequate in only one trial. Only one of the trials included a follow-on assessment and only one of the evaluable trials tested the effect of TM in hypertensive individuals. Three of the five evaluable trials reported statistically significant differences between intervention groups favouring TM and two found no significant differences between intervention groups. None of the five studies was conducted by independent authors without any affiliation to the TM organization. CONCLUSION: All the randomized clinical trials of TM for the control of blood pressure published to date have important methodological weaknesses and are potentially biased by the affiliation of authors to the TM organization. There is at present insufficient good-quality evidence to conclude whether or not TM has a cumulative positive effect on blood pressure.
机译:目的:对先验冥想(TM)的随机临床试验进行独立,系统的回顾,以评估其对血压的累积影响。方法:搜索电子数据库,TM组织收集的论文和官方网站。我们仅纳入了随机临床试验,没有混淆共同干预措施,该措施测量了TM对血压的累积影响。结果:六项试验符合纳入标准,但一项仅以摘要形式报告的试验无法进行评估。建立基线血压的程序仅在一项试验中足够。只有一项试验包括随访评估,只有一项可评估的试验测试了TM对高血压个体的作用。在五项可评估的试验中,有三项报告了赞成TM的干预组之间的统计学差异,而两项则没有干预组之间的显着差异。五项研究中没有一项是由独立作者进行的,没有隶属于TM组织。结论:迄今为止,所有有关TM控制血压的随机临床试验均存在重要的方法学缺陷,并可能因作者加入TM组织而有偏差。目前尚无足够的高质量证据来推断TM是否对血压具有累积的积极作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号