首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Carotid intima-media thickness and carotid and/or iliofemoral plaques: comparison of two markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.
【24h】

Carotid intima-media thickness and carotid and/or iliofemoral plaques: comparison of two markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.

机译:颈动脉内膜中层厚度和颈动脉和/或股斑块:高血压患者两种心血管风险标志物的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVEIn order to optimize cardiovascular risk assessment, we compared the association of common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) with carotid and/or iliofemoral (C/IF) plaques according to the presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and belonging to a high cardiovascular risk group.DESIGNThe study was conducted in 323 subjects presenting one or several cardiovascular risk factors in an internal medicine hospital department; 96 patients had one or more manifestations of cardiovascular disease.RESULTSCompared with patients with no C/IF plaques, patients with plaques at 1-4 sites presented an adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of presenting CVD of respectively [1: OR = 1.79 (0.64-5.04); 2: OR = 3.35 (1.27-8.85); 3: OR = 3.40 (1.09-10.62); 4: OR = 14.41 (3.75-55.40)]. On the other hand, the OR of CVD for 1 SD increment of CCA-IMT was: 0.95 (0.69-1.31). In the group of 199 patients, for which Framingham-based calculations of CV risks were methodologically accessible, both CCA-IMT and C/IF plaques were associated with all cardiovascular risks. Comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves among association of C/IF plaques and CCA-IMT with the presence of CVD showed a statistically significant difference (0.78 +/- 0.09 versus 0.64 +/- 0.09, P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONArterial plaques may constitute a better marker of the presence of CVD than CCA-IMT. Comparisons according to 10-year Framingham equations did not show statistical significance, but both measures seemed to be highly predictive and possibly complementary. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
机译:目的为了优化心血管疾病风险评估,我们根据是否存在心血管疾病(CVD)和以下疾病比较了颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(CCA-IMT)与颈动脉和/或ili股(C / IF)斑块的相关性这项研究是在323位内科医院科室中进行的一项或多项心血管危险因素研究中进行的。结果96例患者具有一种或多种心血管疾病的表现。结果与无C / IF斑块的患者相比,在1-4个部位出现斑块的患者分别具有CVD的调整后的优势比(OR)[95%置信区间] [1]。 :或= 1.79(0.64-5.04); 2:OR = 3.35(1.27-8.85); 3:OR = 3.40(1.09-10.62); 4:OR = 14.41(3.75-55.40)]。另一方面,CCA-IMT每增加1 SD,CVD的OR为0.95(0.69-1.31)。在199名患者中,可以通过方法获得基于Framingham的CV风险计算,CCA-IMT和C / IF斑块均与所有心血管风险相关。比较C / IF斑块和CCA-IMT与伴有CVD的患者之间的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,显示出统计学上的显着差异(0.78 +/- 0.09对0.64 +/- 0.09,P <0.001)。与CCA-IMT相比,它可以更好地表明存在CVD。根据10年弗雷明汉方程式进行的比较未显示统计显着性,但两种方法似乎都是高度预测性的,并且可能是互补的。需要进行前瞻性研究以证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号